patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Arborist: Emerald Ash Borer Infestation Will Lead to End of Ash Tree World

Heather Green, a forester and arborist in Oak Lawn, predicts all of the green ash and white ash trees in the metro-Chicago area will be wiped out by the infestation of the Emerald Ash Borer beetle.

Get ready for Ash-tree-mageddon.

If it hasn’t already struck on your block or in your neighborhood, it will soon. And it will be like Armageddon.

Take it from Village of Oak Lawn forester and arborist Heather Green.

She predicts all of your green ash and white ash trees will die as a result of the invasion of the Emerald Ash Borer. The metallic green beetle is no larger than a penny but packs a wallop the size of a Red Army.

In the case of the Emerald Ash Borer, Green’s findings are like those of experts elsewhere around the Midwest: Tiny beetle larvae deposited under tree bark feed on tree veins and prevent a supply of nutrients and water from being delivered to vital organs, thus leading to tree demise.

So, how should you prepare for the end of your ash tree world? What is your parkway or back yard going to look like in six months? Two years?

“They are here,” Green said of the infestation of the Emerald Ash Borer in northern Illinois and the collar counties of metropolitan Chicago. Experts believe the native Asian beetle species first was brought to the United States in ash wood used to transport cargo on ships near the turn of the millennium.

Emerald Ash Borer: Prepare for the Worst

So what should you do?

“Well, it depends on where you live and what your community’s protocol is,” Green said. “If it is a tree on your property, you need to do some research and get educated on some of the options you have.

“There are options. Bottom line, the tree is going to die. No way to stop it. Now, what you can do—you can prolong that. You can defer it if you choose to do so. And some trees are worth that. If you have one really large, good-structured white ash strategically placed in your landscaping and it provides a lot of value to you, you can look into injecting.

“If the tree is not significantly infested, you do that on private property, depending on where you live. It’s going to cost you say, $200 or $300, to inject it and that may be for a year or two years. But, after that is up, you have to make a decision.

“Am I ready to inject again? So, you have to inject or start the process for removal. You could go 10 years. But at 10 years, your tree is still at risk of dying from the Emerald Ash Borers. So, you’ll need to inject again. Or you’ll need to remove and replace. As a homeowner, you’ll need to balance that out.”

How much money do you want to spend on a tree that is going to die?

“Exactly,” Green said. “If this tree was planted by someone significant to you or has some significance that way, or if this tree has an effective canopy that helps you with the shading and cooling of your house and is not in poor structure—it’s not going to fall apart—then it might be a good investment. But at the same time you’re injecting, you should be putting some money away for removing and replacing.”

Green said to think of injections as a method of medicating your tree. Insecticides are used as a stopgap measure to kill the Emerald Ash Borer larvae. But since the insecticides are injected inside the tree, they only kill existing larvae and they won’t harm the adult Emerald Ash Borer population.

The adult beetles feed on tree leaves until they are ready to lay new eggs. And new larvae will continue to eat away at trees in a revolving-door-like process, Green said. And, as long as there are ash seed sprouts and ash tree roots in the ground, thereby providing a food source, she said there will be Emerald Ash Borers.

Beetle Mania: Problem is Widespread

How prevalent is the EAB problem in the Chicago metro-area?

“It’s very prevalent,” Green said. “In some towns you go into, you can see trees that are dead or half-dead. I would imagine every ash tree in the Chicago area has some level of infestation.”

In Oak Lawn, one of the village’s hit the hardest, 114 parkway ash trees were removed in 2011 through a $30,000 federal grant program that also will allow the village to start replanting trees.

Green said plans call for the removal of another 490 trees in 2012, many in the 107th Street, Keating and Kilpatrick area of Oak Lawn. If all goes as planned, 1,000 more parkway ash trees will cut down in 2013 and ’14, bringing the grand total to about 1,600 lost trees in the village.

“That’s a huge feat, though,” Green said. “That’s assuming Mother Nature works with us and doesn’t give us storms to complicate things.”

To prepare for the loss of ash trees in yards and on private property, Green suggests homeowners start planting their own new trees now.

“Plant another tree over here that starts to grow—strategically, not just throw a tree in the ground, but a good tree for that space,” she said.

Green recommends checking the link to replacement trees on the Village of Oak Lawn’s website, the list of trees running the gamut from bur oak to sugar maple.

Related Topics: Emerald Ash Borer, Heather Green, Patch's House & Home, Real Estate, Village of Oak Lawn, bur oak tree, green ash tree, sugar maple tree, and white ash tree
What will you do with the green ash tree in your back yard? Tell us in the comments.

wade

11:45 am on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

If the entire population of Ash will be wiped out anyway; clear cutting trees to stop the spread of the beetle that will not effect any other tree seems unnecessary. Cut them down as they die or become safety hazards, in a gradual process that will be cost effective for all involved. Replanting is a must; but amazing towns seem to have no funds(?)- Oak Lawn needed a grant for this? Homewood clear cut blocks of trees; and replaced most. Tinley Park has not replaced any trees cut lately; not just ashes, but big old trees on Oak Park Avenue have not been replaced. Tinley seems to have budget surpluses.

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Ron Kremer

3:02 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Wade: After speaking with arborist Heather Green, two things were clear to me: 1. Local government agencies need to devise plans for removal of ash trees on government property (i.e., parkways); 2. Homeowners need to plan for removal of trees on private property. In both cases, cost will be an issue.

Mike Dorr

4:03 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Mike: I had a Dutch Elm on my property in 1993 that had become infested like many others in the area. The village cut it down, and I replaced it with (unfortunately)
an ash. It's at a point where it's grown to be a great shade tree. Now Oak Lawn wants me to pay to cut this down and replace THIS one? What am I paying taxes for?

Reply

wade

4:32 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

For the government property- (Unless there may be a federal law that requires clear cutting; or on a regional basis they still feel they can keep it contained) Otherwise, leaving the trees until they die, a slower process that would spread the costs out might work- It seems a forgone conclusion all the ashes will be lost; however. And yes, I suppose; it will need to be included in the budgets; and in towns that have no usable slush funds,or surplus, it will be difficult.

Reply

Big Green Thumb

9:02 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

In the interests if full disclosure, I'm one of the staff horticulturists for Fasel and Sons Garden Center. Although professional injections are available and rather expensive, there are alternative treatments. I'm aware of 2 products available to homeowners that can be poured around the base of the tree to give protection for 1 year per treatment. One bottle of the good stuff is enough to treat a single tree for several years and costs $50 per bottle.

Mrs. Green is correct though, unless you want to treat the tree every year for the rest of it's life, start planning for it's removal and replacement.

Reply

Ryan countryman

9:43 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Basel drenches have failed miserably over the last few years. Even with commercial grade products. I would recommend to inject. Be awear that even when injecting there is no guarantee. Many trees that are treated, even by injection, still have a chance of dying. Really weigh your options and cost before investing money.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Big Green Thumb

11:26 pm on Wednesday, March 28, 2012

Hello Ryan!

http://extension.entm.purdue.edu/EAB/espanol/index.php?page=faq

This is from '09. xytect is now Optrol and is available to the public. The label allows for the experimental double rate to be used. According to this study, this rate gave the most consistent control and is recommended for trees over 15 inches DBH.

"In an OSU study with larger trees (15-22 inch DBH), Xytect™ soil drenches provided most consistent control of EAB when applied experimentally at twice the rate that was allowed at that time. Recently, the Xytect™ label was modified to allow the use of this higher rate, which we now recommend when treating trees larger than 15 inch DBH. Merit® formulations, however, are not labeled for application at this high rate. Therefore, when treating trees greater than 15 inch DBH with Merit® soil treatments, two applications are recommended. This is not an option for Bayer Advanced™ Tree and Shrub and other homeowner formulations of imidacloprid, which are limited by the label to one application per year. Homeowners wishing to protect trees larger than 15 inches DBH should have their trees professionally treated.." ( My note: Optrol is now available for homeowners)

Based on what I have been reading, homeowners should be able to effectively treat trees smaller than 15 inches DBH themselves with the Bayer tree and shrub product. Trees over 15 DBH would require Optrol. What am I missing? Could you cite your sources, I'm interested in your input.

Ryan countryman

9:44 pm on Tuesday, March 27, 2012

Also if Basel drench is to be considered it should only be done on small diameter trees. No larger that 6" DBH. Larger trees should only be injected. Tree age or imicide

Reply

Scott Carlini

4:19 pm on Tuesday, May 8, 2012

CAN NOT BELIEVE ALL THIS BAD INFO STILL GIVEN, FROM "PROFESSIONALS" IN 2012, AFTER WE LEARNED SO MUCH FROM MICHIGAN'S LOSSES!
EAB infestation will be gone in four years because there won't be enough Ash to sustain them for another build up, EVER. Our Chicago parkway Tree-age treated trees are totally 100% alive(1/2 of one out of 1000 trees has EAB), while right across street, Oak park's historic Ash are all dead or cut down. Chicago area's Native Green Ash has lifespan of over 300 years. 6OO for White Ash, which you can still find around any house over 100 yrs old. Our first settlers had seen what old growth Ash looked like, before they cut them down to use for hardwood building. Thats why they replanted Ash next to house. Maple only lives well for 50 years, and lucky if one makes it to 100. Get 2 yr injection first to let your tree heal with no EAB in it(plus it kills eggs from other trees EAB bugs), then in 2 yrs use 75% Imidacloprid, pour ASAP in spring, because this stuff only kills eating/laying adults, not larvae inside tree. Bayer tree & shrub ii only has 2.75% in it. Our Injected trees have healed well from injection points, but if use more than two times can not be good for any tree. As far as Oak parks Ash trees, Homer says DOH!, look at Chicago's.

Reply
Comment_arrow

D Greg

12:15 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012

Hope you are right. My whole block is infested this year. Wasn't bad at all last year, but this year, almost all the trees are at least 1/2 dead.

Patch_comments_icon

Ron Kremer

12:22 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012

D Greg: Sorry to hear about the situation on your block. Are the trees in your yard? Or on village property? Have you thought about replacement trees yet?

Reply
Comment_arrow

D Greg

1:31 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012

They are all parkway trees - is that my property or the village?? What do we do about it?

Patch_comments_icon

Ron Kremer

1:39 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012

The village would be responsible for parkway trees. You might want to call and talk with an official to see what plans are in place.

Reply

Ozzy

2:45 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012

I searched on how to ID them and am confused as ever. Seems to be too many variations and close relatives to ID any I may see.
http://www.emeraldashborer.info/files/eab_id_guide.pdf

Reply
Comment_arrow
Patch_comments_icon

Lorraine Swanson

10:30 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012

The way it was explained to me is that ash borers look like lightning bugs but without the yellow bellies. When they get under sunlight, they have a metallic green color. Your best bet is to call your village aborist and/or government office and have the bug identified.

Patch_comments_icon

Ron Kremer

2:53 pm on Monday, May 14, 2012

Ozzy: My suggestion is this: Call a local arborist and/or village official and ask for help. Or perhaps a garden center expert.

Reply

Christina Bettenhausen

3:33 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012

Ryan is correct. My husband and I own Precise Tree Care in Frankfort and we are no longer using Xytect except for on the smaller diameter trees. We recommend TreeAge and have actually seen VERY good results. We also agree with Scott as far as how long you'll have to treat the trees for. At some point, the bugs are going to go in search of trees they CAN feed on, and will move out of the area. Sure it's a gamble, but I'd rather try and treat my tree and save it then cut it down and start all over.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tori Linthicum

1:02 am on Thursday, September 13, 2012

Christina,

I read the other posts where you promote your tree service. After reading all the posts and seeing how you fabricated responders to the questions, it's clear you can't be trusted in this matter.

Your stated price of $15/diameter-inch demonstrates that Heather Green is correct in replacing trees as the best option in most all cases. I think perhaps your advice is disingenuous. If you are trying to drum-up business, offer a special for removing the trees instead of the obscenely costly dragging-out their inevitable demise.

Scott Carlini

6:22 pm on Wednesday, September 12, 2012

Thanks Christina. Yes, it will be five or six years till no EAB, but with the class of 2012 borers being so exponentially large compared to last years population, by 2014 the bug will be finishing up it's only food source, untreated Ash trees. Arborist Heather Green reminds me of when I wanted to be a music DJ. Found out that I could not choose songs to play, only follow prepared list. Ms. Green's trade of desire was to help our urban forest, but then learned that saving parkway trees would be only up to themselves to survive without her help. She is not even allowed to "Girdle" a dying Elm to keep DED from "Root grafting" into still good tree next to it. A caring person has to let trees die, and her love was to be there to save them. Or again like me fixing electronics, it's all throw away now when I want to save them from the garbage. Her most dangerous (to people saving their Ash trees) mistake was saying EAB bugs survive in trees root system, even if tree dead or cut down. Also that bugs can continue to stick around(like DED) on young sprouts. Very true that stressed Ash trees "Masted" or mass seeded in forest, and native local DNA will reforest our woods. But a few surviving EAB won't let trees get old enough to infest with enough numbers to kill saved trees because Ash can handle a few bugs and heal over each year, and borer larvae never anywhere near "roots". People want to save the rain forest, but don't even help an American tree native to Chicagoland.

Reply

Tim Leensvaart

11:01 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

I agree with treatment. Did any city foresters attend conference with the release of the Hazel Crest treatment trial. From talking to someone involved in that trial, it appears to offer real world numbers of treatment vs removal for the whole life of the trees.

Reply

Tim Leensvaart

11:28 pm on Thursday, October 11, 2012

Oh and please don't mislead people on your personal gut feelings about what is going to happen. Base your recommendations in reality with current studies. I keep hearing city foresters quote removal/containment strategies that the dept of agriculture renounced years ago. This is all going to come to light sometime.

Reply

Scott Carlini

6:42 pm on Friday, October 12, 2012

Thanks Tim for pointing people to "Real World" trials that were done 4 all Ash tree owners sakes. I spent money & time delivering info to every Ash owner in ten mile area. Most don't know they even have Ash till too late. That is why trees don't get treated till already heavily damaged. People need to know that once a tree is bug free it does not decline further like a disease, but sometimes does not show improvement first or second year, and might be misshapen once dead stuff is cut off. BEST NEWS is owners put off by Arborists high charge for treatment(costs them $4 per & they charge $10) can "Pour it" themselves and only pay $35 for Enuff Imidacloprid supply to last 2 years for most size trees. My trial during heavy Infestation of small public parkway trees, 98-120 yr old historic Jens Jensen park trees and two of Chicagolands oldest/largest 200+ yr old Green Ash has officially(Me) been successful so far using the cheapest "Double Dose" option of 75WSP. If Tim and I are wrong...Wait never mind, some of our most important statements about EAB are proven, and only poor uptake or improper application of right insecticides will kill your tree. "I told you so" does not bring back trees that could have been easily saved. And those incorrect town Arborists who replant with Maple while Verticillium Wilt spreads into newest parkway tree disaster. Then they wonder why uncaring residents don't water new trees against 2012 drought all because family wanted to choose different species.

Reply

Scott Carlini

2:00 am on Saturday, October 13, 2012

Validation so good. EAB leaves in spring 2 mate, don't let back into tree early summer only to kill in late fall. Simple as that! Treated tree IS trap tree for Mother EAB. Savior is how Borer kills every tree, even very young. No EAB will be left but treated trees will be. Then your Ash will spread seeds. That is why arboretums sell Prairie plants now, to spread GOOD NATIVE seeds back into everybodies back yards. Euphoria is EVERY public tree I treated for last two years Full and alive with leaves till fall 4 $15 small 2 $35-4-200 yr olds. Another pride moment when Chicago proved that Tree-Age can kill EAB for a Three year stint = Cost $60. Next biggest result when untreated Ash in middle of treated City Ash still alive and well during heavy infestation. Now I dare an uninterested TOWN Arborist to tell me otherwise. After viewing over 1000 of Chicago's tree-age treated trees(First used against farm fish lice), and almost 100 privately treated trees, plus my own mix of small to largest Green, white, and one Black Ash(Blue still OK on it's own), this is not your Grandma's Elm disease. Treated trees are living accomplishments from SMARTER people than fools who transport firewood. And smarter than Japanese Auto wire harness suppliers that build products in China & pack assembled products into fresh Asian Ash wood containing live EAB to Detroit. Even smarter than towns who use Ash mulch cut under inch spread around other Ash trees in town! Obamalamadingdong I TOLD YOU SO, NOW GO!

Reply

Tim Leensvaart

10:55 am on Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Well I do have to say that there are no fixed costs for treating Emerald Ash Borer. Every treatment is carefully metered and applied based on the diameter of the trunk of the tree at 4.5 ft from soil level. Bigger trees require more insecticide so they will cost more. Also the most current research says not to use Imidacloprid (-the soil drench or soil injections) for trees larger than 25" in diameter because of poor distribution. Trunk injecting the same chemical only provided one season of effective control. The same studies say that only one season of coverage can be obtained from those treatments. TreeAge lasts effectively for two full seasons. The third year the test trees did receive damage even when using higher rates. There have been many articles about how Chicago is under treating their parkway Ash trees by spreading out the time between treatments. Blue Ash trees will also be infested along with our other Ash trees. They will probably last longer than the others, but WILL like all Ash be killed eventually if not treated. Every thing I said is based on university and government research.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Scott Carlini

6:57 pm on Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Good to hear real world results quoted instead of rumors & guesses Tim. I would love to read those articles written about Chicago's program as I only have proof of the treated trees to go on. The Orange tagged ones were treated 4 years ago and will get Blue tagged when retreated this year. Most have survived to this point very well with minimal damage. The silver tagged trees done two years ago are not looking as good, and evidently were injected with less product. I have already been warning these people to treat tree themselves w/Imidacloprid for one year till City re-injects. Also, less injection holes means spotty coverage on big trees. Last year the City did not treat or re-treat any. If insecticide needs to fill the newest growth layer each year, I don't know how the Tree-age does this except for its long molecule string which does not break down so quickly unlike other products. I have been observing three untreated Blue Ash trees, and they have lasted three years longer than Green or White Ash so far with minimal damage. Like you said, they too will eventually succumb, and would be the easiest Ash to save w/insecticide. Their bark is one of the thickest of our native trees. If Arborists did not charge 75% over cost or $10 per DBH for the tree age, and $8 per DBH for Imidacloprid injections, many more owners would save their trees. It only costs Chicago $20 per tree, but like you said each sized tree gets an exact amount, so it could be less or more than that.

Scott Carlini

7:37 pm on Tuesday, April 9, 2013

Yes Tim, the protocol for trees over 25" are to have a professional Arborist apply compared to owner "Pouring it" themselves. It used to be 15” before approved double dose. Arborist soil injects it with better equipment or trunk inject, and still last one year, but has better uptake. Biggest problem was as tree size got bigger, dose rate would have to also rise, and this was not being done, thus poor results. Tim, I know you Ignored all field tests from 04 because of outdated dose rates. Also, it takes 2 good uptake years to finally fill whole tree with Imidacloprid. 75% active ingredient sticks to organic matter(weeds or grass) much more than 22% stuff. Guidelines I have told large tree owners to follow 1st year is treat with tree-age if EAB damaged, otherwise soil inject Imidacloprid 4" or less @2.80 grams per DBH, once in Fall, then again in April, or once in April & again in May. Treating more than one tree per acre may go over total label amount allowed. Restriction for 1 Acre= 128”DBH total treatable tree inches or 8.5 oz total applied Imidacloprid 75%WSB-WP. It's 25.6 oz total applied for 2F or 22% stuff, and again 128”DBH total treatable inches per acre or 4-32"DBH trees. Telling people to use more insecticide than instructed will not kill tree, but EAB certainly will if nothing is done! I do not want people poisoning their communities drinking water either. It is each of our responsibility to read the label and not abuse insecticide. Thanks for the update Tim.

Reply

Leave a comment