With the release of the Godfrey & Kahn report, a new view of the Village’s inner workings became available to taxpayers with a hunger for knowledge as to how their tax dollars have been spent.
This expansive document is not light reading, but nothing worth doing is ever easy. Everyone I ask is uniformly happy that the report is released, but nearly 100-percent are confused over the circumstances leading up to it, what it says, and what it means for the residents of Oak Lawn.
This confusion certainly isn’t helped by Mayor Heilmann’s recent comments to Patch which imply that a subpoena concerning of the hiring of Querrey & Harrow (to replace Mayor Heilmann’s friends at Tressler and community theater friend Chimenti) falls within the scope of the work they were contracted to perform.
Heilmann included these documents in his press release despite written instructions by the Assistant United State Attorney asking “that you not disclose, directly or indirectly, the fact that you have received this subpoena or your response to it.”
To be clear, Godfrey and Kahn was retained by the Village of Oak Lawn with one specific purpose: The “analysis of the basis for and amount of potential claims for damages the Village may have arising from its relationships with certain third parties.”
The Village Manager’s office released a public information release in May of 2011 that stated that the former legal team was terminated because of “concerns regarding billing practices and mounting complaints of performance deficiencies received from department heads and Village Trustees.”
Furthermore, based upon the “authority and duties vested in the Village Manager’s office under Illinois Law and the the village of Oak Lawn charter, the Village Manager has engaged the law firm of Godfrey and Kahn, S.C....This action explicitly demonstrates the Village will exercise to the fullest extent any and all remedies available to recover monies rightful due and address any possible official misconduct.”
Mayor Heilmann’s actions are featured prominently throughout the Godfrey & Kahn report. He attended the executive session meetings where these items were discussed. He is intimately involved with every detail in the report. Despite 1000+ pages that allege shocking concerns about the legal work rendered the Village by his attorney friends, he’s criticizing Godfrey and Kahn for something he knows is beyond the scope of what they were hired to do.
Could Mayor Heilmann be trying to divert attention away from a document that states: “From 2005 through 2009, the largest single donor to the Unity Party was Tressler. In conversations with individual trustees around the time that Tressler was fired, you referred to Tressler as 'my friends.'”
These are the very friends that he negotiated an unbelievable $21,000 monthly retainer for, despite the previous attorney’s retainer of less than $4,000 per month. These are the very friends who have refused to turn over hundreds of documents related to the investigation, even though those items are paid for with taxpayer dollars - a clear violation of legal ethics and standard practices.
Despite alleged damages totaling several million taxpayer dollars as a result of Mayor Heilmann’s legal strategy and friends, he has nothing to say to the residents who have seen their public trust in him betrayed except more finger pointing and convoluted accusations.
Ironically, in his press release he warns that “ ...we have a duty of loyalty to those who elected us. A public official can be held to have violated that duty and convicted of a felony if he knowingly creates a false appearance that he is acting in the public interest, when, in fact he is affected by a concealed desire to protect or enhance his private interest or the private interests of those he benefits.”
Mayor Heilmann does have a duty of loyalty indeed. As outlined in the Godfrey & Kahn report and the Odelson report, that duty of loyalty appears to have not been to the taxpayers, but to the friends who helped get him in office and keep him there. That is the take home message of the Godfrey & Kahn report, plain and simple. It’s the message Mayor Heilmann does not want you to notice.
OakLawnGuy
6:59 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
OK, Mr Heilmann is guilty, Mr Phelan did just fine, and the crack Board Of Trustees and other Village officials were innocent dupes in the whole episode. (;-/) So now.......how about addressing other vital issues?
SmallManBigWoman
8:50 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Wow. Think of the good and amazing things Oak Lawn could have done with the $10 million this debacle cost taxpayers. Not a vital issue? Politics as usual, and no biggie? Are you insane?! Think of what the cops could do with half of that.
I applaud Dr. Bury for digging in and fighting for us. If she didn’t fight this, no one would know what really is going on. She’s got my vote!
Still waiting to hear anything from Heilmann on this. It’s not going away, as much as he wants. And people won’t forget his sneaky tricks to keep it from us.
Charles Martel
5:32 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
O.L. Taxpayer hit the nail right on the head! Look around at how Oak Lawn is changing...for the worse! How many section 8's are there in town? Anyone ever look around over in the area around 103rd and Central? The K-Mart/Dominicks area is a disastor and an eyesore. Oak Lawn use to bec a nice quiet village...not anymore! As for where I live in town (St. Linus Parish) I can see the same trends happening here that happened to St. Thomas Moore Parish in Chicago.
Justsaythanks
7:27 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Can you at least say thank you for the $475,000 platform you are running on paid for by the taxpayers.
SmallManBigWoman
12:43 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
funny how you turn this nastiness around to make someone who stands up against it appear to benefit. bury had nothing to do with heilmann's deceit or cover up. she's the one who wouldn't let him get away with it. don't forget it! every taxpayer is a loser here unless you are heilmann's best buddies - then you get away with millions.
Real issues, please!
7:37 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Exactly. Dave did all these horrible things, yet no criminal charges or recommendations for such by tom's frat brother. Doc, do think your best buddies came out snelling like roses in that report? Yet, its just Dave who is the only problem. Plus you cleverly ommited language regarding release of info regarding subpoena. Doc, what are you going to do about east siders robbing us at gunpoint in our garages? What are you going to do to keep me from moving out? Bangers walk our streets every day, robbing people in parking lots and their garages. I'd like to hear more from you on current issues. Do we have enough firefighters and police? Should we be looking to fill existing retail vacancies before building a high end mall bordered on southeast by a 1/2 sq mile cemetary. Every time you harp about lawyers, it turns people off. Dave understands the issues. If you are to have any chance, you need to demonstrate you have a grasp on other issues besides political witch hunts by either side.
RightSaidFred
9:34 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Leadership, direction and protection start at the top. Get the right people in place and progress can be made on all fronts. It's hard to move towards a safer, more productive city while the administration is concerned with lining their pockets. Time for a change.
O.L. Taxpayer
11:41 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Are you out of your mind???? "Dave understands the issues'" Then why are we afraid to walk around at night? Why are we being robbed in our garages? Why are so many people looking to move out of Oak Lawn? Bangers are walking around this town like they own it and nothing has been done by Dave reguarding this. All of his focus is on the debacle that is 111th street so his mommy and daddys wishes will be fulfilled. They bought a house near that decades old eyesore and want something done about it. How about the eyesores of the downtown area? oh yeah lets build another bank like we don't have enough of them in this fricking town to be robbed. Address the parking situation along 95th street. Nice parking lot we own next to the VFW hall, If it were owned by a private person they would have fines up the wazoo for how bad that is. Open storefronts(new mind you) Closed businesses,lack of faith in his ability to lead and now his loss of legal friends funding his campaign. Hopefully this will be the end of the reign of Dave and that stupid idea of moving the Mason hall to build an ice rink.( Just what we need, another facility no one will use)
QC
3:55 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
No there aren't enough Firefighters. Phelan is /was their supposed liason )what a joke) and he has been out to ruin them ever since His last election, After they helped him pass out campaign literature. My guess is that during his 1st Term the Fire Dept realized what a bully and liar he is and wouldn't help him out on his 2nd Try. Just my opinion. The Fire Department also won a suit Against the village for illegal layoffs and understaffing. Ask Oly about the Police. He is/was their liason. lol
vote
9:55 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
QC, there are plenty of firefighters we need more police. By the way I heard the firefighters paid for Dave's fundraiser/dance theater show Conflict of interest??
Dist2Curious
9:39 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Ten million dollars? Where did you get that number? From Dr. Bury and her spin mechanics? And, if you want to question the fees of any of the lawyers, first ask ALL of the trustees who votede EVERY time to approve the bills that were being paid by the Clerk. Second, ask about how the fees went up when there was a humongous law suit against the Village based on some fireman allegedly (never proved) tossing off on a female firefighter's bed. Turned into kind of a big deal. But ten million? That's beyond fantasy.
And the mayor's "sneaky tricks to keep it from us"? You mean like a confidentiality and non-disparagement provision in a settlement agreement that was approved by the whole board? Come off it. Like the comment above says, Real issues please!
Barney
9:58 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Sandra I'd be interested to see your reaction to a FBI investigation against Mayor Heileman instead of one of your political.buddies. Take a look at how this lady as a candidate protects her group over the whole during a FBI investigation. I doubt that would change if elected mayor. Let the Feds do their jobs., then react to the conclusion.
QC
6:38 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
OL Taxpayer
"Then why are we afraid to walk around at night? Why are we being robbed in our garages?" Are you suggesting that Dave is out doing all of this damage? That HE ALONE is responsible for the crimes committed by outside factions? LMAO
OakLawnCitizen
10:12 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Let's hear what you are going to do to make our streets safe. Quit the "finger pointing" and get to some substance. I want more police on the streets!
Quiet Neighbor
11:55 am on Thursday, September 27, 2012
I agree with those that would say that your continued rampage against the Mayor even if it was warranted (and it's not by a long shot) is a distraction from real everyday issues that affect the taxpayers and other residents, visitors, etc. on a daily basis. Your platform is transparency and help small business owners. You are a small business owner. How is that not helping yourself? Isn't that a conflict of interest? Aren't Oak Lawn business owners your "friends"? So as a Mayor you will be helping your friends. It really isn't as evil as you'd like to think or make others believe is it. It will be ok when you do it just not for anyone else. You have already demonstrated that you will spin facts and omit relevant facts to sound like you are right. How is that a better image for Oak Lawn? Unfortunately now, as your platform changes to include all the things that people have brought up and will bring up, none of those are your ideas or they would have already been part of your campaign. Everything you've mentioned in your "issues" only talks about the board and business and the politics of it all. Since I'm not on the board, and I'm not a business owner where do I fit in your vision? The residents and average joe's and jane's have to realize that different isn't always better and the loudest screamer isn't necessarily right, just talking more.
anthony
12:15 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Looking good....
Ken Jamroziak
12:30 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
If you think the average resident doesn't care about their government making insider deals and ripping off the taxpayers,you are just not being truthful to yourselves. Of course public safety matters,but honest government does too. If the village lost Millions of dollars of taxpayer money due to this law firm the mayor suggested, that money could have hired more police and fire to keep Oak Lawn safe. The economy is bad, people are hurting,we don't want our property taxes to keep skyrocketing. Stop the political excuses, investigate the issues and make your choices in April
Dave C.
12:35 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
I am ready to start a petition to have Oak Lawn adopt a new flag. I believe tha the photo of Ms. Bury in front of what looks like our US Flag would be the way to go. Is anyone with me on this one?
OakLawnGuy
1:59 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
No.
Garbage
1:48 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Oh ye of miniscule minds. You keep supporting King Davey and refuse to look at the various press releases and information presented about how he has involved himself in allowing his friends to rip off the village. You refuse to point the finger at him after all that has been said. You refuse to recognize his press releases as just another opportunity to point the finger at someone else. He brings up the federal subpoena and investigation as another way of getting the spotlight off him and pointed elsewhere. If there was something, there sould have been issues raised by now. Dr. Bury has raised many points from legal documents and emails and conversations that should open the eyes of the blind supporter of the King. The actor is really doing a great soft shoe dance to move issues away from him. His power grab is an embarrassment to this village and his lackeys as well. You mention the vacant property in Oak Lawn. What has Davey done to bring businesses to help this village? He only does something when there is a photo op. Get your heads out of the sand and placing blame on others. He is the one in charge and does nothing but cry on being blamed for paying his lawyer buddies thousands of dollars in excess charges. At least Dr. Bury isn’t an actor or lawyer. That is a good start and she is addressing issues now publicly.
OakLawnGuy
2:04 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Well, no, she's really not. Not yet. I have no qualms with her using the lawyers' report as a campaign issue, just not one with which to sledge hammer the voters. And it's true, it's the only specific issue that's been presented and responded to from either side. Creating an environment in which the Board works together and in transparency is not addressing issues, it's a catch-all. Safety, TIFs, empty storefronts, THOSE are issues. I'd like BOTH candidates to speak to them, then I'll decide. Speaking of transparency, as long as she aligns with certain incumbent Village officials, you will never get the complete transparency that Dr Bury promises. Never. I believe the facts bear that out, so to me that would be a lower-item issue on the agenda.
TP = SB Campaign Writer
9:33 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
She'll save us from the Bad Guy! "To Infinity and Beyond!!!"
QC
4:08 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Not an Actor? Right Tom, she has you writing her scripts and "Other" village board members making up Ugly statements to throw out and see what, if any, sticks.
AS far as "If there was something, there sould have been issues raised by now."
Really? Now you're going to tell the Feds that they're taking too long with their Investigation of ......... Who is it now? "Oh ye of miniscule mind"!
Dist2Curious
2:54 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
The real issues. Ah...yes. Well, Dr. Bury did work with the Oak Lawn Rotary and Mr. Deetjen to raise over $100,000 to spend on the nice 9/11 sculpture by the train station. Isn't that something? And, she did participate in her own self-absorbed effort to rename the Metra station "Oak Lawn Patriot Station" or some such thing that's totally irrelvant. Those seem to be important things that will spur growth and bring new businesses to our community, right?
Certainly, the sculpture and the renamed station are significant improvements that demonstrate her capabilities with respect to bringing business development to Oak Lawn and that she is a visionary. Please say I'm right.
Luther
3:54 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Is she usung Guilianis' "noun, verb, 9/11" tactic as a campaign model?
Romnney is doing quite well in some polls by criticizing the incumbent without offering any solutions of his own also.
" I'll tell you after I'm elected what I intend on doing"
James Manning
10:45 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Mr. Eggert I like your quote on business, the problem is the current administration got involved in that 111th st. TIF debacle. We lost a lot of money on that venture. TIF's are governments way to interfere with business. They don't work. I wish the last two administrations would have heeded Mr. Thoreau's words!!!
vote
9:58 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Is everyone Tom QC? I think there are a few people with some thoughts against the job our fair Mayor is doing!!
vote
3:09 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
I believe OLG that the Mayor is the only candidate who has announced a running partner. DR. Bury has not I believe . The campaign has just started I think more issues will be coming to light!!
OakLawnGuy
6:07 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Oh yeah, I agree, but there's too much energy being wasted now on this back and forth. I mean, she backed, Mr Heilmann forthed, and now let's talk about other items.
QC
6:42 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
QC??
Is that your Family Crest? I can see a slight resemblance, but he has more hair and a nicer profile.
vote
10:31 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
You should talk Charles Bronson's little brother!!
anthony
12:39 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gPJ1RAfl9M
It seem some posters have a similar mental state to this guy...
Bob
3:43 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Does the mayor get to write his own article. I have yet to hear what Bury has planned for Oaklawn. Her platform is not what she will do as mayor but to rip the mayor. If she wins the election she will have nothing to say since Dave is gone.
fred wiese
3:51 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
I hope Dave H sees what a makeover could do for him.
Melissa
4:20 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
I'm tired of Dr. Bury pointing her finger already. No person is confused about the over spending on legal fees...at least not anymore. Dr. Bury please start telling us where you stand on the economic issues, safety issues, the utility bidding, TIFs, etc.. At this point I'm not inclined to vote for you since you sound like a broken record/cd and can't stop complaining about the same thing over and over and over again. I suggest you put together a whole slate of candidates to run with you so that you can bring that transparency that you keep touting to the Village Board.
SmallManBigWoman
4:26 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
I think people get the legal fees. They don't know how much he has worked to cover it up....i hope she shouts it from the rooftops. Let the broken record play ... it's the sound of truth and justice. It's kind of catchy.
Barney
4:37 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
She has a slate. Very limited , but a slate. He accuses people of being lackeys, but cowards behind a fake name.
Fredrick
7:19 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Barney, who is He?
Melissa
4:40 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Give me a break. You can shout it out but can't make it your only basis for your campaign. Only wish Dave had a more worthy opponent because it sure sounds like Dr Bury will bring more loyalty to new friends and old foes.
Melissa
4:44 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
OL needs to get rid of Phelan and Ole too...they all need to go.
fred wiese
4:54 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Melissa, don't hold your breadth on what needs to be done. Here's my take on the Slate 2013
LD stays
M= SB
Clerk ????
1 st ????
2 nd AO
3 rd ????
4 th TD
5 th ????
6 th TP
o'toma binlyin
1:05 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Melissa, well it just so happens that I have a spot for both<
Melissa
5:03 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
How can the OL voters keep Phelan around when he brings the same issues to the table as the current Mayor? Also, from what I hear Phelan likes to drink a lot at public events...not what we need now is it?
fred wiese
5:20 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Maybe Patch can poll their reader's and find out.
Real issues, please!
5:21 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Transparency? Right, nice glam shot.
Real issues, please!
5:22 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Darn it. I thought Eggert was keeping quiet on these boards. Talk about know it all egomaniac.
Real issues, please!
5:23 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
Fred, what is point of your nonsensical slate? 3 and 5 aren't up for reelection.
fred wiese
6:57 pm on Thursday, September 27, 2012
little sensitive rip feel better
2 nd AO
4 th TD
6 th TP
point being is that she goes with her fan club
vote
12:11 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
Secret campaign meeting.... The mayor tells all his friends to blog and attack his opponent. Talking point.. she has only 1 issue, She has no ideas,she is Phelan's puppet. Where is her platform? We will make fun of her looks, We will attack her on the patriot station etc. It sure sounds like it they are following orders Keep it coming guys and gals Dave is worried, I would be
Lorraine Swanson
2:32 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
QC??, please change your user name immediately. I'm going to let your comment stay, but you are misappropriating the identity of another user. If I see another post from you as "QC??" I will ban you. This is your only warning. Please read Patch's terms of use, oaklawn.patch.com/terms
QC
6:43 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Get counseling quick, ??.
QC
4:12 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
vote/Tom
YOU SHOULD BE worried. LMAO
vote
10:00 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Worried about what?? I'm not running for anything ( yet )
#1 Disgusted Resident
4:35 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Secret campaign meeting.... Executive Session:
Trustee #6.. Acting big shot. Jane, Roll Call Please.
Distr. #! Absent Distr. #4 What? Oh I second that!
Distr. #2 Here Distr. #5 Absent
Dist. #3 Absent
Trustee 6 tells all his friends to blog and attack the Mayor and Trustee 5. Talking point. They are the only Bad Board members the village has and the 2 of them are bringing down our town. issue, She has no ideas, she is Heilmann’s puppet. Where are his rebuttals? We will make fun of his and her looks, We will attack him on the community projects he participates in and then declare that he Never gets involved in the village etc. It sure seems like you’re following My orders. Keep the dirt coming guys and gals Dave is bound to speak out, so just keep nailing him.
This meeting is adjourned!
sue s
12:19 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
It would be nice if Patch interviewed each candidate to get the answers to the residents' questions instead of reading the opinions/hearsay of those who comment. I just feel like neither candidate has offered any information about their platform and the comments make it seem like everyone has some "insider information" that leaves me feeling in the dark.
Lorraine Swanson
2:26 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
Sue S.,
Rest assured that Patch will be compiling a local election guide for April 2013, including candidates questionnaires, interviews, etc. And we will be soliciting residents' questions for candidates. I know these comment boards get read by local candidates/elected officials. I'm sure they're taking notes.
District 666 Resident
9:42 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
Hey Sue,
It is September 28, 2012. We haven't even gotten through the November election yet. Just because ole doc bury and her merry men want to campaign for a year doesn't mean the rest of us want to hear it
SmallManBigWoman
10:02 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
Dist 666 Res - Just cause Heilmann campaigns with a song and dance instead of issues doesn't mean everyone should campaign that way. You might recall Heilmann was the one that started off his campaign first. Bury came after, and has her facts correct. No smoke and mirrors or show tunes with her, thank God.
Brad
10:54 am on Friday, September 28, 2012
A lot of very disturbing facts came out in that Godfrey report regarding the mayor. Sadly, most residents will never read it or even know where to access it. And the initial mailer from Bury was way too long, and came across as a political attack moreso than an airing out of facts. I do not have the answers as to the best way to get the facts out there regarding this disturbing chain of events. But in my opinion, long winded mailers will be dismissed and actually hurtful to her campaign. I do find it comical though that she attacks the mayor and his record, and the mayor responds by attacking a trustee. I have no clue how that helps his damage control against his opponent, except for trying to push his indescretions under the rug by attacking someone else for something completely unrelated.
vote
9:41 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Hey disgusted, you stole my idea. The only thing is my comments were true, yours were fantasy, I know another theater crack couldn't help it though..
QC
8:33 am on Wednesday, October 3, 2012
@vote/Tom
Not running FOR. Running FROM. LMAO
QC
6:23 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Brad (LOL)
Are you flippin' kidding???
Sandra Bury is NOT attacking the Mayor And his Record. She IS attacking him because her Handler/s insist on it. Go back to 2010 when Patch first started and read all of the BS provided By Sandy's Core Group. This was well before she decided to run for Mayor, and they've been relentless with the Same Smoke and Mirrors! These are the Thugs that She decided to surround herself with! That being said, I for one Truly Question HER JUDGEMENT!
There were Quite a lot of Very Disturbing facts in the Report about Trustee Phelan, or didn't You Notice them?These two topics are directly related!!!!! It was a political Witch hunt initiated by Trustee Phelan with Streit and Deetjen following closely behind. The Federal subpeona, that was served on the village, was regarding the hiring of the Law firm of Queery and Harrow, which was "suggested by Madigan" and cheerfully executed by Deetjen, wink wink, (Tom Phelan) and Streit. The unscrupulos Trustee wrote, directed and Produced this debacle to Deflect from his Dirty dealings, and lack of skills being the Finance Chairman, that caused this whole mess!!! THEY ALL SIGNED OFF ON THE LEGAL BILLS AND THE CONFIDENTIALITY CLAUSE!
Your statement "trying to push his indescretions under the rug by attacking someone else for something completely unrelated." is laughable!!
faithful reader
10:29 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
QC,
You are off the rails again. I read the report and I read Sandra Bury's "newsletter". I've also been a reader of the patch. I never saw any reliable story in which Madigan said he "suggested" that the village hire Querry and Harrow. It doesn't make sense but the Tribune tried to make that connection because the Mayor said it was true. (so don't put the Trib story link on here because I've read it and note that the story is lacking in evidence). That doesn't make it true any more than Sandra Bury's attacks are made true just because she says so. In any case, my rambling here comes down to one point: Both sides play very loose with the facts and accusations are not facts no matter how much you believe those accusations.
Faithful Reader
11:29 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
QC,
YES Really! And still you put that silly link on your comment. What part of this don't you understand? There is no evidence at all that Madigan recommended the attorneys only allegations of the Mayor. Like I said, saying something a hundred times doesn't make it true. That applies to Dave and Sandy
vote
10:29 pm on Friday, September 28, 2012
Once again you are off you meds QC, Did you read the report?? Qc's standard reply... It's all Phelan's fault,it's all Larry's fault,it's all Madigan's fault,It's all Streit's fault. Dave is as pure as the driven snow. He is innocent in everything, he doesn't blame and deflect his enemies do. The whole village is against Dave the great. According to the report,Heilmann said " I will handle the legal business " Hypocrite that you are QC
Fredrick
7:33 am on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Mr. Phelan, You are a disgrace to your family as well as the village of Oak Lawn.
Your posts are becoming more and more vile and disgusting each day. Everyone knows these post are written by You. Anyone that has been around you or known you can see you typing away spewing your hate filled rants, like you have so often done in the past. Anyone that disagrees with you is fair game in your eyes, and they shall be dealt with! No exceptions!!!
QC
4:27 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
faithful
Really?
"Madigan declined to be interviewed and rejected requests for records related to
his efforts in Oak Lawn. His spokesman Steve Brown said there was no connection between Madigan's support for the water project, ***** his recommendation for the village attorney***** and his political support for a trustee.
"It was part of his typical effort to build working relationships with local officials," Brown said."
BTW, just in case:
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/watchdog/ct-met-oak-lawn-mjm-20100626,0,6319109.story
By David Kidwell, Tribune reporter
June 27, 2010 Madigan's allies get slice of village business
Faithful Reader
11:36 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
QC,
YES Really! And still you put that silly link on your comment. What part of this don't you understand? There is no evidence at all that Madigan recommended the attorneys only allegations of the Mayor. Like I said, saying something a hundred times doesn't make it true. That applies to Dave and Sandy
anthony
1:08 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
Would be so juicy if one could prove village board members post here...omg To list every post a Board member ever made....Even if they didnt admit it was them... all it needs to be is true.
vote
10:04 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
QC,I'm gonna tell Mikey on you, Better watch out, better not cry, better not pout, I'm telling you why Madigan is coming to town!! BAAAAHHHH
o'toma binlyin
1:13 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
vote, I have a spot for him too! Now that's a co-inky-dink<
vote
10:02 pm on Saturday, September 29, 2012
I am not load blover although I agree with the views!!!
QC
11:58 am on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Fithful reader
"(((His spokesman Steve Brown)))) said there was no connection between Madigan's support for the water project, ***** his recommendation for the village attorney***** and his political support for a trustee." Oh, "And still you put that silly link on your comment." You're right I did, and precisely for this reason, there are a lot of "underinformed" people like yourself out there, Jane.
AND WHAT PART OF THAT DID YOU NOT UNDERSTAND?
Faithful Reader
1:47 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
QC,
It is obvious that you don't understand that every word written in a story is not a conclusion reached by unanimous acclamation.
The story said "...Amid this public feud, the mayor received a rare telephone call from Madigan. Heilmann said Madigan called to suggest Paul O'Grady, a partner at Querrey & Harrow, for the village attorney job. The mayor said he told Madigan about the dissension over the issue at Village Hall and his concern about Phelan's connections to another partner at the firm. According to Heilmann, Madigan offered to call O'Grady and ask him to withdraw the firm from consideration..."
That sounds like Dave told the reporter the above scenario occurred. Nobody else in the long article said the conversation occurred and in no part of the article does anyone state that Madigan called Deetjen (Who appoints) or the trustees, who favored O'Grady and Stillman. In any case, Stillman isn't even with that firm any longer.
So, quit calling people "uninformed" or "Jane" and start admitting that just because you conclude that the facts happened as Dave said doesn't mean it happened that way. WHAT PART OF THAT DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND? (and yes, I've added capital letters just as you did to make sure you know I'm emphasizing my anger.
Faithful Reader
1:52 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
According to Heilmann, Madigan called him and recommended the attorneys.
Heilmann told him he couldn't hire O'Grady because Stillman and Phelan were connected.
Heilmann didn't act on the "Madigan" suggestion
Everyone else involved said that Madigan didn't call them to put O'Grady in the attorney position
So, how can one conclude that the action was done at the behest of Madigan?
QC
3:29 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
FR
Because, and I re-post for the 3RD time ""(((His spokesman Steve Brown)))) said ***** his , (Madigan's) recommendation for the village attorney***** .
You're right. He didn't call them, He Told them, Phelan, Streit and Deetjen, in the Private Meeting in Springfield in April 2009, you know Just Prior to all of the Havoc Reeked by said three regarding the Prior Attorneys Fees that They ALL signed off on! BTW,I don't see Anywhere that "Heilmann told him he couldn't hire O'Grady"!
However, I Do See: "The mayor said he told Madigan about the dissension over the issue at Village Hall and *****his concern about Phelan's connections to another partner at the firm.**** According to Heilmann, Madigan offered to call O'Grady and ask him to withdraw the firm from consideration. "How can I conclude that Action? That's the MO, Exact same scenerios, Exact same quotes and denials, in Many cases, Exactly Like This one
PS You are the One concluding that I am going by what "the facts happened as Dave said" JANE! As usual twisting and turning the words of another.
O, what a tangled web we weave, When first we practise to deceive! Sir walter scott
kissing cousins
4:27 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
QC you're commenting on a story about Dave Heilmanns freinds legal theft. Quit bashing your cousins wife you are family whether you like it or not lose the misplaced anger.
#1 Disgusted Resident
4:44 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
If I am not mistaken, their husbands are related, not Jane and Carol. Also I recall reading somewhere, most likely on the Patch, that Jane Quinlan actually sued Carol Quinlan regarding campaign funds and lost. True?
Lorraine Swanson
1:43 am on Monday, October 1, 2012
Trustee Carol Quinlan and Village Clerk Jane Quinlan are related by marriage. Their husbands are cousins. A lawsuit filed by former Unity Party slate members, including Village Clerk Quinlan, against Mayor Heilmann and Trustee Quinlan was tossed out of court last summer.
KC
6:43 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Carol Quinlan accepted stolen money for her 2011 campaign taken by her puppetmaster Dave Heilmann. Carol should reimburse the village for her salary and health insurance money rec'd since all she does is Daves bidding.
Yakity Yak
7:22 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
KC: Stop it Jane! Stop letting Tommy post for you, or is it you posting for him. You two have been using too many screen names playing the same broken record. Same old gossiper.
vote
9:57 pm on Sunday, September 30, 2012
Yakity look at the pot calling the kettle black. Everyone knows there are two posters that are for Dave maybe three. Hypocrisy abounds all over this blog