D122 Bonds To Improve Schools, Pay Back Debt
District seeks roof improvements, restructuring of outstanding debt. Administrator says future cuts and changes imminent to balance budget.
Ridgeland School District 122 board members last Thursday approved the sale of two sets of bonds for the purpose of capital improvement projects, plugging the expected budget deficit and restructuring debt obligations.
About half of the approximately $5.2 working cash bonds will go towards refurbishing the roofs Harnew and Lieb elementary schools and purchasing playground equipment at Columbus Manor Elementary, among other technology and security updates throughout the district.
The sale of another $3 million in general obligation bonds to refund the district’s outstanding debt over the next four years that stemmed from a poorly structured bond issue before the 2007 housing crisis, said Eric Trimberger, assistant superintendent for finance and business operations.
“The way the bond payments were structured, it was assumed that property taxes would increase 12-percent every triennial,” he said.
In laymen's terms, the district assumed home values would climb four-percent a year. We all know now they didn’t. They plunged.
“Effectively, what we’re doing should result in no additional tax increase,” said board president Dan Sodaro, noting that tax bill bottom-lines depend heavily on the county. “When the assessor gets involved, things change, but we’re not actually involved with that.”
Trimberger said the bonds should yield a 3-percent interest rate, but it depends, of course, on market factors.
“When we feel it’s the best time to sell the bonds we will do so,” he said.
The working cash and refunding bonds were approved unanimously on Thursday at the Board of Education meeting at Columbus Manor with a 5-percent and 7-percent ceiling, respectively. Board member Christine Glader-Wendt was absent.
The district has until March 1 to sell the working cash bonds and until April 1 to sell the refunding bonds, though it’s likely they’ll be sold together, Trimberger said.
Also approved on Thursday was the establishment of an escrow account, where the bond funds can earn interest.
As Patch reported last month, the school’s deficit is projected to be about $700,000 next year. That figure could increase to between $1.6 million and $1.7 million the next two to three years and $2.3 million in five years.
As a result, the district's roughly $9.8 million fund balance is expected to dwindle to about $1.9 million by the 2015-2016 fiscal year. It was only balanced this current fiscal year because of federal stimulus money included in the Education Jobs Fund Bill and others.
“We’re still going to see the deficits, but the bonds will help plug some of the hole,” Trimberger said. “We have cash reserves on hand, and we’ll have to look at more budget cuts.”
Parents, teachers and staff last month tossed around ideas for closing the budget gap. Foremost among them were shortening summer break and putting a referendum on the 2013 ballot that could raise $5 million.
On Thursday, the assistant superintendent said cuts in programs, forgoing new computers and textbooks and reducing class sizes are likely. Moreover, teacher union contracts end next year and will need to be renegotiated.
“There’s so many unknowns,” Trimberger said.
sickoftaxes
12:03 pm on Monday, January 24, 2011
What a debt-bomb waiting to explode. Glad I don't live in such a mismanaged school district.
Do you hear how stupid you sound?
8:06 pm on Saturday, January 29, 2011
If you are from Oak Lawn and want to talk about debt-bombs, let's talk about the $250,000,000 in bonds that are being issued by the village board. I am all for making sure the water system is up to date but why have we waited so long to do anything?
Since when is restructuring debt and making sure that schools have good roofs and students have equipment being mismanaged? Maybe the OL Village board could takes some tips from the School District on how to maintain their equipment and services.
OakLawnGuy
8:42 pm on Saturday, January 29, 2011
Doyou, let's not talk about the bond bomb. I was shouted down in an earlier comment section about this. But it's there, ticking away.......
I think the water system was left for so long because (A) the Board ignored it for more than 40 years, since it remained a cash flow concern (never mind that it was a money-loser for 10 years) and (B) past village managers have just let it ride. I'll hand it to Messrs. Deetjen and Streit, they knew theaw problems that existed and have done something about them.
Do you hear how stupid you sound?
9:19 pm on Saturday, January 29, 2011
The water system has been a ticking time bomb for a long time. It is a shame that it has been ignored for so long. Didn't I read on this site that the water towers haven't had a long term maintenance plan since the 30s, can that be true? I am certainly not saying we should not maintain our systems just lets not wait a half a century before we take any action.
The cynic in me wonders if it is getting addressed now because of the dollars amounts tied to it. I believe the companies working on the project up to this point throw some money into out elected officials campaign funds every couple of years. This has been an issue for 40 years and we have had at least one trustee in office for half that time and another one thats pretty close to that. Did they just realize that we supply water to half of the southwest suburbs???
Seems like the only thing going on around here lately has been shouting. Also, I feel like that first post was put there more as a swipe at the Board President for daring to challenge the status quo than someone trying to have an intellectual discussion.
Hopefully Lorainne will post an article about the last Village Board meeting and we can move this topic there and there can be some honest debate without shouting and name calling. Not that my screen name is very nice and it certainly isn't directed at you.
oaklawnmom
10:11 am on Tuesday, January 25, 2011
The entire state of Illinois has been mismanaging school funds for years. Illinois is one of the bottom states in terms of funding schools. At least 122 is doing the right thing by children and trying to educate kids properly. I don't know what district u live in "sick of taxes" but I'm sure wherever u live is next.
shameful122
10:16 am on Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Ridgeland 122 is shameful for selling out the future. All those millions must be paid back and future generations will suffer.
OakLawnGuy
12:58 pm on Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Boy, Oaklawnmom, you got it. The State owes EVERY school district millions. The bonds and tax increases are out there to supplant that money. Yes, it creates a debt bubble....but what else can they do? I know what voters can do, vote intelligently and demand that your reps, senators and Governor address this discrepancy. Well, OK, maybe too late for that......
ridgeland122parent
2:49 pm on Tuesday, January 25, 2011
@shameful122
selling out the future? please, these children ARE your future! they are YOUR future doctors, nurses, policemen, firemen, etc.
QC
3:58 pm on Tuesday, January 25, 2011
Well Phelan you do live in a mismanaged village that you helped to mismanage, so your point is.........
QC
4:00 pm on Tuesday, January 25, 2011
shameful122
You certainly are shameful!
merrit???
11:10 pm on Saturday, January 29, 2011
It's 40 million over 40 years lot of money but the water system needed to be upgraded from years of neglect by the coalition party for 28 years!!!
Do you hear how stupid you sound?
11:26 pm on Saturday, January 29, 2011
Bob for 20 years
Jerry for 16
Tom P , Alex, Dave 6
Carol 4
Tom D 2
That's a lot time to fix things too.
Maybe if everyone would stop arguing things would start getting done.
Again, I am not saying it's a bad project but why so long in the making?
I haven't read about the 40 over 40. Is that public knowledge or did you just tip your hand?
merritttt
11:34 pm on Saturday, January 29, 2011
public baby watch a meeting for a change