D229 Considers Reducing Courses To Offset Growing Budget Deficit
Oak Lawn Community High School Dist. 229 superintendent admits he's not overly optimistic of district's efforts to reduce deficit spending without take drastic steps at first of two public forums.
D229 officials floated a plan to possibly cut the number of classes that student is allowed to take in an attempt to stem deficits in the 2013-14 school year.
Subscribe to the Oak Lawn Patch newsletter and breaking news alerts.
The measure was unveiled last week during the first of two public forums to discuss budget planning and rising deficits at Oak Lawn Community High School. The district is also considering a bond sale to help offset $500,000 in deficits when school reconvenes next month.
Referring to a PowerPoint presentation, assistant superintendent Rick Hendricks told parents, teachers and community members that the district could start running up annual deficits of $1 million beginning next year unless drastic steps are taken.
See the PowerPoint presentation for the budget planning forum.
“It we don’t make significant changes now at some point in time we won’t have sufficient funds available to continue to operate the school,” Hendricks said, D229’s financial manager.
Hendricks blamed the flat real estate market from the 2008 recession on deminished tax refunds from Cook County, and only partial payments from the state of what is owed to the district.
The D229 board of education has been working with district officials on a possible $8.2 million bond sale to generate income for the district, $1 million of which will be pumped into the district’s reserve fund. The remainder will be allocated to 2012-13 operational expenses and facility improvements for the 60-year-old school building.
D229 superintendent and OLCHS principal, Michael Riordan, said that the school board would vote on a preliminary operating budget in August, and the final operating budget in September.
The operating budget for the upcoming school year is $29,155,438 based on projected tax revenues. Projected expenditures for 2012-13 are forecast at $29,655,096—representing a $499,558 deficit.
Monies from the bond sale would “help the school make ends meet” in the coming school year.
“We’re cut to the bone,” Riordan said. “It would be difficult to cut another $500,000 from the budget.”
In addition to eliminating a combined 10 teaching, staff and full-time substitute positions, the district eliminated 19 extracurricular coach and faculty sponsor positions in 2011. The district also introduced student fees for sports and extracurricular activities, and combined some clubs.
The OLCHS teachers union agreed to forgo 6 percent of contractual raises over the next two years, Riordan said.
One of the proposed scenarios for 2013-14 was to limit student course enrollment from 7 to 6 classes. Since 2004-05, OLCHS students have been able to take up to 7 courses per semester.
Enrollment restriction would result in at least 60 less sections representing a $520,000 reduction in personnel, or eliminating 7-9 teaching positions. The district is also considering consolidating support staff positions through retirement and attrition.
“[The goal] is to get expenditures even with revenues, and roll reserves over a period of time,” Riordan said.
Tell your friends to like O-L Patch on Facebook; 1,500+ and growing.
The superintendent/principal said changing back to a 6-class course load is commensurate with other comparable high school districts in the region.
Students most likely to be impacted by the proposed enrollment restrictions are those taking music, art, technology and foreign language electives.
Asking for the public’s input, several parents suggested holding fundraisers for such programs as music, or seeking private grants.
Riordan said the school has made attempts to increase fundraising by holding carnivals and benefits with moderate success, but not enough to keep pace with the growing half-million-dollar deficits.
“We’ve done quite a bit already to get costs down to maintain the same pace as revenue, but only made minimal progress,” Riordan said.
Parents also asked about holding a school referendum, but after the 2007 referendum passed, the district agreed to a ten-year moratorium.
“There is no board consensus at all that a referendum would be prudent to pursue,” Riordan said. “A lot of energy would be expended with very little chance of success.”
Kathy Barry, a parent, said there is a public perception that the district and board has already made its decisions.
“I want to know if that is true,” Barry said. “If it isn’t true than what you’re doing to combat public opinion that the decision has been made.”
Riordan said the district has been talking about the need for an adjustment for the past few years.
“A decision has not been made,” Riordan said. “I have to admit that I’m not overly optimistic that we can [reduce] expenditures without taking this next drastic step.”
Asked the day after the meeting if being a one-school district has contributed to D229’s financial woes, Riordan said: “I don’t think or know of any significant differences between single or multi-school districts. All school districts are having budget problems due to diminished revenues.”
D229 has set up a web page including the PowerPoint presentation from last Thursday’s meeting on the budget planning process. Answers to the public’s questions will be transcribed and posted to the website. Community members can also email questions before the next public forum scheduled for 6:30 p.m. Aug. 23, in the Oak Lawn Community High School media room.
Sandy Paul
7:23 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Thanks for keeping us informed with this article Lorraine.
Great job also to Dr. Riordan and Mr. Hendricks - the powerpoint is very informative.
Times are tough...
oaklawndad
1:55 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Sorry Sandy but the PowerPoint contained very little actual information, just a dog and pony show. Considering Mr. Riordan’s and Mr. Hendricks’ 2011 compensation packages of $221,000 and $180,000 not everyone is having a tough time...
OakLawnGuy
7:35 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
I'd suggest sending a "past due" notice to Illinois, asking for the money owed the district, but there's no longer room on that pile.
luego
8:05 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
In April 2007 sd229 residents voted in favor of a referendum allowing a 22cents tax increase. This was supposed to keep them solvent for 10 years.
CJM
8:39 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
I hope all concerned don't go "dollar wise and community foolish". In the 'burbs, the public high school is a centerpiece and one of the main measures of desirability. OLCHS used to be very highly regarded and indeed was a reason many chose to settle in Oak Lawn.
This is a critical time for both the school and the village. If the school continues to slip in terms of perception and performance, so will the community.
A moratorium on referenda? Things are a lot different now than they were in 2007. If the residents vote it down, then I guess they get what they deserve in the long run.
lou
8:54 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
here here iuego, how can we keep giving them more money when they cant handle what they have now? do we really need a superintendent ? lets start there. then lets make everyone pay their way if they want extra activities.and its mighty nice that the teachers unions forgoing their raise. they need to feel the pinch like the rest of us.
luego
9:12 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
And to think they wanted a brand new school which wouldve costed probably 60-100 million. The local real estate agents push for it so they could sell more houses and boost commissions. A few parents wanted it but it got shot down in flames because residents simply can't afford the bare essentials.
OakLawnGuy
10:05 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Luego, Lou, anyone blaming OLCHS admins for the financial bind: bear in mind the State of Illinois owes this school district, and every single district in the State, thousands of dollars. Illinois is several years behind. A school district has to budget the state money, but when it's not paid in, where do they then get it? I also hope you're writing your representatives encouraging them to shoot down any laws that would then turn the burden of pension/school function support to property tax payers, because then you'll really see an education implosion.
oaklawndad
12:51 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
OLG- While I typically agree with your comments I think you are a little off base here. The State certainly has its share of blame in this scenario but late and missing payments are nothing new around these parts. Why hasn’t OLCHS planned accordingly? You cannot completely blame the Administration or the current board but expenditures cannot consistently exceed revenue. Anyone that was there when the last contract was approved, be it board or administration, has some explaining to do. Yes, I know it was amended, too little too late.
luego
10:42 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
a little touchy OLG now are we? I bet you're a liberal who supports Quinn on top of that. Did you or anyone you know get hired in the district to be so overprotective of the admin?
OakLawnGuy
10:54 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
No, I'm not employed by 229, no longer have kids there, and have no vested interest. People's anger is misdirected when it comes to school finances. If you want to label me, go with it, if it makes you more comfortable, but to ignore what Illinois has done to financially short-change every district is to have your head in the sand.
Sandra Bury
11:26 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
OakLawnGuy is totally correct.
luego
11:06 am on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
i live in the district and remember the referendum well. I know it's different times since 2007 but you can't solely blame the state for the inability of taxing bodies to live within their means. or make projections on worst case scenarios. Its funny how the same very people who blame the state always vote for Democrats like Blago, Quinn, Madigan
luego
1:38 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Well I was promised in 2007 that if I voted for the referendum the district wouldn't need money or cut programs for another 10 years. We're only half way there.
lou
2:04 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
why cant they spend more than they take in? our president thinks its ok
luego
2:13 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
That's the mindset of most local Democratic leaders.
oaklawndad
2:28 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
This is not a Democrat or Republican thing and the President has very little to do with this issue as Federal dollars for education are minimal at best. Please don’t muddy up a very real issue facing our community with the us versus them argument.
lou
2:52 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
oaklawndad if u really want 2 solve public education in oak lawn we need education vouchers
oaklawndad
3:44 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Lou- How exactly would vouchers fix the educational system in OL? I suppose I really do not know enough about them but it would seem like just another rob Peter to pay Paul situation. OLCHS would receive less money from local property taxes and the State. The local private schools would benefit, but let’s face it half of them aren’t in the best shape either, but they would in turn send kids with (for lack of a better word) “issues” back to OLCHS. In the meantime would the private schools be held to the same accountability standards as the public school? What am I missing? Any idea where reliable information is out there on vouchers?
Educator from oak lawn
3:06 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Riordan is to blame! Why does he always find something or someone to blame. He is the CEO....right? He has been there in a decsion making capacity for a long time. When is he going to be held accountable? Just two years ago he was building a new kitchen for Ms Trotto.
oaklawndad
3:56 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
It’s not that simple. You cannot just blame one person. These issues predate the Riordan reign, not to say he has done anything to fix them. Let’s not focus on who is to blame. Is there any way we can learn from the past, granted OLCHS has yet to present all the info, and move forward? The proposed cuts will hit 95% of freshman and sophomores and 75% of juniors and seniors. Seems to me that the one group that holds none of the blame is the one getting the shaft and that’s the students.
Jesse the Brain
4:13 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
We all have sticker shock with our last tax bill. the school district receives an automatic tax increase every time the assessors office compounds the taxes as they have done over the past few years. It does not matter how much money we give government, they will never have enough. Maybe the school district should find ways of buying local to save money instead of wasting our tax money by purchasing out of state. No I don't feel sorry for them, but I do have empathy toward the students who want to learn.
andy skoundrianos
10:25 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Quite right John
oaklawndad
10:59 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Keep in mind that equipment and supplies account for roughly 4% of the budget. You may be correct about saving money by purchasing locally but it is going to be difficult to make up the type of money they claim to need on purchases alone. That said every little bit helps.
Colleen
4:13 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Start off by changing back to the six class load and see what difference it makes.
lou
4:35 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
oaklawndad do u really think our public education is better than our private schools in oak lawn?
oaklawndad
4:58 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
I do not see where I said anywhere that one type of school was better than the other. If you have a special needs student then you typically end up back at the public schools because a lot of the privates cannot offer the programming that is needed. I did say that “half of them aren’t in the best shape either” and I will stand by my opinion. Do I feel some of the local public schools are better than some of the private schools-yes. Am I saying all of one type is better than the other-no.
andy skoundrianos
10:31 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Ol Dad I went to Columbus manor and Simmons I then went to Chicago Christian High School. I thought the public education I received was good, but it didn't compare to the private school education. More teachers, Smaller class size, They did more with less money per pupil than public education. Oak Lawn is a great high school my brother graduated from there. But I think most parents if they could afford it ,would send their children to private schools, that's my opinion only though.
oaklawndad
4:36 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
So take away the class where kids can sample different things and start making decisions on what direction their life is heading? Or can the class we eliminate be gym? I am an OLCHS graduate and decades since I last left the building I have never had to play dodge ball, climb a rope or do a wind sprint. (Before some wise guy asks - yes, I am still in decent enough shape to do any of those things). What about the extras? How much is football, baseball, fishing etc costing the school?
lou
4:43 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
do what it takes 2 balance the budget
QC
4:44 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
This may contibute to the problems that Illinois is having with all school funding.
http://oaklawn.patch.com/blog_posts/back-to-school-health-fair-on-august-10-at-shepard
lou
4:47 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
get kids more involved, make them get off their xbox, go out sell decals candy whatever they need 2 do 2 pay 4 their uniforms ice time equipment .i see some doing their part 4 their activities y not all
vero
4:52 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Hello Q.C.,
What is your point that the health fair is a waste of money? What do you know considering your children attend private schools?
vero
4:57 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Dave W why don't you weigh in as mr real estate knowit all?
vero
4:58 pm on Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Grunty how did you get your nickkname? While on the toiler?
Hometown pride
6:21 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
There has been constant issues surrounding Oak Lawn during the Mike Riordan era. Board bullying, teacher morale issues, rapid rise in expulsion and drug arrests, budget concerns, declining academic scores, and OLCHS has become a school with a terrible reputation in the south suburbs. Every time there is an issue, here comes a fancy PowerPoint from Mr Riordan with little substance or truth. When is the community going to demand better?
OakLawnGuy
4:10 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
"OLCHS has become a school with a terrible reputation in the south suburbs" - where do you get that? Don't just say you know a lot of people who say so, because I know just as many who will refute that. Including me. The facilities are outdated in many ways, but I would put their staff and curriculum up against any public school south of Madison St.
lou
7:50 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
i hear u but one guy is not the reason 4 declining academic scores. vouchers vouchers vouchers
get them out
8:53 am on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
rapid rise in drug arrests are due to influx of lower class people from the city. Minority gangbangers cause this. the rise in expulsion is a good thing. a brand new building won;t stop this.
lou
2:49 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
we cant tell the truth, we have 2 b pc. am i right liberal educators?
OakLawnGuy
4:14 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
To those who support the voucher system in education: that's only the beginning of the costs that the voucher holder assumes. The money spent per annum on an individual student by a school district comes nowhere near matching the tuition cost for a student in a private school. It's one of a few huge objections private institutions have against vouchers. The amount of fundraising that is essentially required of private school students now, in addition to tuition and fees, would therefore also fall far short of what it takes to support student in a private school with their current academic and support requirements.
OakLawnGuy
4:16 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
What a voucher system would do ultimately is lower academic performance across the board. As Andy noted earlier, most parents, if given the opportunity, would send their kids to a private school. What happens when they fill up, as several most certainly would? What if you want Jack or Jill to get into St. Linus and are told there simply is no more room? It's a system with a myriad of issues that frankly education systems, public and private, are not equipped to address.
OakLawnGuy
4:19 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
The cherry on the voucher sundae is this: what happens when the State Of Illinois runs out of money, and vouchers become IOUs? This will certainly happen, they can't pay their bills as it is. Will Brother Rice accept a note with $3000 printed on it that isn't worth the paper it's printed on? Are they willing to get in line behind OLCHS, Richards, Hannum, Simmons, OLHMS, etc. with their hand out for payment? I think that answer is NO.
oaklawndad
6:30 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Now that’s the oaklawnguy I was looking for!
lou
5:01 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
quite drinking the kool aid oaklawnguy the voucher system would force our public educators 2 do a better job. why do u think the unions r so set against them.and 4 your info it cost way more per student in public schools. get yer facts straight.
oaklawndad
6:38 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
lou- I am still waiting for you to provide some info on how the voucher system works. Please remember that typically private schools do not pay their staff much as public schools, don’t offer retirement, are not held to the same educational standards as public schools and can refuse to accept a student. They also receive some monies from the public school depending upon local grants received and depending upon which school, they take a cut from the whichever church they are affiliated with (this assumes you are talking about religious based private schooling) and are also supported by alumni to a greater degree than public schools (for whatever reason that may be).
OakLawnGuy
7:24 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
I'm not drinking the kool aid so I don't have to "quite". "mer" facts are straight. All you do is say "vouchers vouchers vouchers". I'm sorry you lost your job (to which illegals?), I'm sorry you lost your house, but you still don't know what yer talking about. I mean, "you're".
OakLawnGuy
7:27 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
If u h8 the teachers 2 much, thatz OK. I u h8 thr union, thatz OK. "Vouchers vouchers vouchers" RguMint still holdz no fax.
SpartanPride
5:19 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
With so many opinions here, go over to OLHS in August and offer up money saving ideas in the forum. 1,800 students in the school. 20 parents show up to discuss the issue. during last school year, there was a seminar for parents on substance abuse. attendance by parents? barely over a dozen.
oaklawndad
6:49 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
SpartanPride- There was also a freshman orientation that was poorly attended by many staff members and administration. Your point is?
I personally had a prior engagement but do intend on attending the next meeting. Will you be there? If so, are being paid to be there?
Was the information send to every tax payer in the district or only parents? How about the phone blast?
SpartanPride
5:23 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
when was the last time you've heard that a union opened a current contract and make salary concessions before the contract end date? think hard.... how about a teachers union? think real hard. what the teachers, admins and board accomplished with those concessions for the last 2 years is testament that all want to work together to do it right for our students in oak lawn.
the parents in oak lawn need to wake up, smell the coffee, and get engaged with making the community and their school a better place.
prophet12155
5:56 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Oh yes, what a concession and heartbreak to open the contract! The salary increase over the 4-5 years of the contract was 40-50%!!!!! WHO GETS THAT PERCENTAGE OF AN INCREASE IN THIS DAY AND AGE!?!? Please, once the staff learned that there would be STEEP cuts in the number of jobs, you bet your butt they reopened the contract, they didn't want to lose their sweet, sweet union job with tenure. The teachers wanted to do right for THEMSELVES, not the students. If they really wanted to do right by the students, then maybe the staff would take less of a stipend for all of OLCHS sports teams (non-winning ones, of course, except bowling) and that the stipend wouldn't be based on number of years that you have had tenure in the district. The selflessness is just astounding.
oaklawndad
6:10 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Prophet- Don't forget about the Cook County tax rate caps that virtually ensure that the revenue increases OLCHS would receive over the life of that contract would pale in comparison to the actual raises received by the teachers. Also, I think the teachers received those first two years of increases so that is a pretty nice bump before having to settle for a couple of 3% or 4% years. I honestly do not know how that last contract sounded like a good idea to anyone involved. Granted the Union didn’t need to give any concessions somebody on their side should have seen those raises were a bad idea to begin with.
lou
5:28 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
thats true spartan, it was mighty nice of the teachers union 2 postpone their raises while the rest of us struggle
SpartanPride
5:42 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
take a look at your tax bill and compare against last year. now look at who is getting what. do you see the chunk that the k-8 gets?
oaklawndad
6:19 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Exactly which K-8 district are you talking about? There are at least two that feed into OLCHS and I believe both districts offer pre-school in addition to K-8. Both have recently built new buildings or modified their existing buildings. Both have expanded their programing and made considerable investments into their technology programs. One even went so far as to add minutes to the school day-not take away a learning period. How do their teachers contracts compare? What additions has OLCHS made to enhance the students education?
lou
5:59 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
thanks prophet,finally someone with the courage 2 say it like it really is!
lou
6:05 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
spartan, i wish i still had a tax bill, lost my union job 2 illegals, then lost my house.now renting
oaklawndad
6:26 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Spartan Pride- Since the comparison of the elementary school districts and the high school has come up. Maybe you can tell me why are the fees at OLCHS six times what I pay at my local K-8 school? What is the salary comparison between the average high school teacher versus the average elementary school teacher?
Please remember you started the comparison not me.
lou
7:14 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
let me explain one more time 2 oaklawndad, vouchers will make the teachers that dont care anymore work harder 2 keep their job when they see parents taking their kids out of public schools and in to charter or other private ones. the parents would have a choice of the school.i think the parents know what would b better 4 their child.that would bring our failing education system up to our standards not the governments. and why should tax payers pay 4 any ones pension. most of us are hurting
OakLawnGuy
8:27 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
The question as to why taxpayers should support a pension should have been addressed dozens of years ago, moot point now. The idea of having a choice of schools to attend, a true choice, is in practice a fallacy under a voucher system. What would need to be worked out is how the private schools would be allowed to pick and choose who they want to attend their schools - and make no mistake, they will be picking and choosing. Johnny's Mom and Dad wanting him to attend St. Baptism will not guarantee that he gets to go there, and the school's option will not be limited strictly to grades. Teachers will not have to work harder to keep their jobs because they will still be tenure-based, and if a teacher has tenure, it's going to take a paper trail a mile long to get rid of that teacher. In short, vouchers are not the answer, and they will guarantee, IN NO SHAPE OR FORM, higher quality education OR a wide open choice of schools. Really - read up on the voucher movement, and the reasons why it is not the education standard.
oaklawndad
7:26 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
And where is the proof that this system will work? I have read you spout the same line over and over but you haven’t provided a link. I agree that the pension system in Illinois is screwed up. The upcoming changes in state law will hold teachers more accountable. You can dictate what the standards are if you get involved. This isn’t a movie, sitting here saying “vouchers” three times will not make them magically appear. Which of the local private schools could absorb the 2000 kids at OLCHS that would obviously go streaming out the door to the promised land of education? Build a charter. With what money and how long will that take?
lou
7:46 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
thanks 4 the correction, i went 2 olchs. is oaklawnguy and oaklawndad the same person? r u guys teachers? oh and did i say illegals, sorry i meant undocumented
OakLawnGuy
8:28 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
No, not a teacher and no relation to Oak Lawn Dad. We put 3 kids through OLCHS, they were very successful, and proof that what you will get out of that school what you put into it.
lou
7:51 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
hopefully wer done talking about public education and we can talk about r useless us postal service. ( i mean were and are)
oaklawndad
8:15 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Lou- I am not oaklawnguy and I work in the corporate world (the land of pay freezes, outsourcing, rising healthcare costs, and fund your own retirement) as does my wife, the kids are school age and the dogs have their papers. Let’s keep it one issue at a time, but I do enjoy getting Christmas cards in the mail.
lou
8:49 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
tenure or not they would b laid off if they didnt have kids 2 teach.by the way, i dont hate teachers, just bad ones . they have a big influence on our kids.as for the mile long paper trail, u just made my point 4 me. teachers union is a big part of the problem. lets really put the kids first. god bless u guys ,its been alot of fun talking to both of u.i hope thers no hard feelings and id love 2 send both of u Christmas cards.
vote
9:42 pm on Wednesday, July 25, 2012
Why does OLCHS need a superintendent When there is only one school in the district?? Never understood that. Public sector unions are killing this country. The government won't fund the pensions, the unions don't want to give up the perks and want raises when most private section employees see hours cut,benefits lost and no raises. It's called shared sacrifice
Gary
11:50 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012
Why are we paying over 30 teachers over $90000 a year, for a job that only lasts 9 months? The only teachers that deserve that much are coaches, and teachers that are required to work extended days. Just because they get a Masters, does'nt make them a better teacher to our students! And why do we have to pay a incoming superintendent more that the person they replace? I We need to stop overpaying some and look to what will better serve our students. Throwing more money into a education system that doesn't prepare students for the real world is stupid! The last time there was a tax hike, the superintendent and many of his staff, got nice BIG RAISES! You said they same things last. Shame on you, all you want to do is cry poor, so you can line your own pocket with our money!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Oak Lawn Lifer
11:54 am on Thursday, July 26, 2012
It's a shame after double dipping ...that 229 blew All the referendum cash from 4-5 years ago AND all the bond money they pulled AFTER the referendum passed...obviously they have NOT been spending wisely.... They will never pass a referendum and I can only HOPE they bonding authority is pretty much used up so they can't pull another back door referendum. You made the bed....now lay in it !!!
oaklawndad
4:19 pm on Wednesday, August 8, 2012
Maybe this will explain some of the problems
http://southtownstar.suntimes.com/14298715-522/top-paid-teachers-blue-collar-suburbs-offer-blue-chip-pay.html
Concerned Oak Lawn Resident
2:02 pm on Tuesday, August 14, 2012
Who eliminated the position of Principal at OLCHS yet assumed the role himself on top of his existing position as Superintendent and simply paid himself the extra salary associated to the role. Does a single school in one district community even need a Superintendent? This at the same time his teaching staff was asked (and agreed) to take an overall 6% cut from their already approved contract when in March of 2011 teachers voted 146-29 to take raises of 4% and 6% over the next two years. Your entire staff agreed to a pay-cut rather than lay-offs, increase classroom size and over-tax the remaining staff at OLCHS (which would have adversely affected the education of the 1,800 students attending OLCHS) Where’s your pay-cut Mr. Principal/District Superintendent? So don’t simply and blindly assume that the salaries of the teaching staff are to blame. When you cut from the bottom up in education all you succeed in accomplishing is penalizing the students (which ARE your ENTIRE reason for existing). We won’t fix this by cutting teacher salaries and hiring new, cheaper educators straight from college, shortened school days or lowering credit hours for graduation. Fix this from the top down. Who holds two positions in one school and within a one district community? Who assigned himself the two combined salaries? Who requested and was awarded $7,270 in unused vacation? Whos salary in a single year could reduce the now required bond by almost half? Blame the man driving the bus