patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Inferno on 95th Street

Video of Wednesday's extra alarm fire on 95th Street.

 
0 of 0
Flames consume the inside of Eva's Bridal Shop as smoke billows across 95th Street on Wednesday afternoon.
Photos (1)

Photos

Videos (1)

Videos

Video of Wednesday's fire at Eva's Bridals.

Related Topics: Oak Lawn

Stacey Roseen

9:10 am on Thursday, November 18, 2010

Incredible video! More great coverage of this terrible fire. Thanks for keeping the community up to date.

Reply

Latoya Campbell

12:10 pm on Thursday, November 18, 2010

Wow! This was a horrific event, but this video is amazing! Great job, Lorraine for such great coverage of this terrible fire. And thank God that no one was hurt.

Reply

James Laban

5:31 pm on Thursday, November 18, 2010

It took them long enough to put a hose to the fire. If they would have started to hose down the place and not stand and look at the fire maybe there might not been so much damage the Eva's or Radio Shack. They vent and watch, how about some water as long as your there. Anyone can stand and watch it burn.

Reply
Comment_arrow

firefighter

5:47 pm on Friday, November 19, 2010

Hey Jerkwagon, I was on the first arriving engine, which responded in about 3 min. We got a 2 1/2 hose off and on the fire in the rear as fast as humanly possible. I love it when people have no idea what they are talking about try to contribute. Leave your assnine comments at home where someone might believe you.

Angelique Shaw

8:39 am on Friday, November 19, 2010

I have a brand new size 24 white halter top dress, it has the 4 inches of extra length, top is beaded, rouched bottom, train, etc. Will fit size 22-26. It just arrived on Tuesday (11/16/10) at the bridal store where I purchased it. My wedding is far enough away that I can re-order. If interested, you may purchase for the same cost I was charged. Please email me at angelshaw9@hotmail.com and we can arrange for pickup and payment at the bridal store. My prayers are with you.

Reply

Bettie Geertsema

10:43 am on Friday, November 19, 2010

I have to agree Firemen there but no hoses, and then only 2 what took so long to get the water to the fire? Then so many fireman but nothing to do..... still only 2 hoses.

Reply
Comment_arrow

firefighter

5:52 pm on Friday, November 19, 2010

Betty, I'll tell you the same thing I told the Jerkwagon above, we had water on that fire. When you learn how to fight fires give me a call. We had two 2 1/2" lines in the rear of Evas and had entered the building. If they apply water to the front of the building it poses a possiblility of pussing the fire down on my crew in the rear. Stick to guessing the riddles on wheel of fortune.

Comment_arrow

Sally Citizen

8:19 am on Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Seriously people...how can you tell these firefighters how to do their job?

James

5:48 pm on Friday, November 19, 2010

Everyone should not rush to conclusions about how long it took firemen to get water on this fire. This video only shows the front and not the rear of the fire building. There were at least three to four initial hoses in the rear before this video was taken of the front of the building. This was a great job by the oak lawn and surrounding fire departments.

Reply

James

6:01 pm on Friday, November 19, 2010

Well said Steve these people were not there and shouldn't Monday morning quarterback fires if they have no idea what the fire service is about. That was picture perfect line placement by the first in engines in the rear.

Reply

PuaHate

7:14 pm on Friday, November 19, 2010

ROFL...........seroiusly............ROFL

Epic fail by oak lawn fire department. I could have taken the pace bus to Eva's with a cup of water, and got water on the fire faster than OLFD.

And LOL at people saying "don't rush to conclusions about OLFD not getting water on the fire fast enough...........people aren't rushing to conclusions.........they are looking at the filmed evidence of the conclusion.............and epic fail by OLFD.

This video should be posted on "fail" blogs all over the internet.

.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sally Citizen

8:21 am on Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Wow, clearly you aren't a firefighter because you would know otherwise!!! Perhaps you should learn how to spell before posting.

James

7:19 pm on Friday, November 19, 2010

Rolf? Lol? Epic fail? What are you 15 years old. You obviously have no idea what you are talking about and again were not there. I was there. Steve was there. We were both on the initial companies that responded to the rear of the building where the fire attack originated. Keep your immature comments to yourself if you have no idea what you are talking about

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sally Citizen

8:22 am on Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Tell me about it! Must be a "wanna be" firefighter who doesn't understand.

James Laban

9:51 pm on Friday, November 19, 2010

Steve, No one has called anyone names, except You. As a Public Srevent you have a lot to learn. You might consider another line of work. You really need to grow up. Also, if you feel the need to call me names, don't hide behind a pen, do it to my face. Don't let your mouth write checks your "back side" can't cash. You may want to keep in mind that Urlacker and Briggs are smaller then me.
I understand why the front windows needed to be broken. Fires can be struck by fighting them on two fronts. Firefighter standing and watching the fire grow is not putting out the fire. Fires are not struck by stand and watching. It takes water, lots of water, or remove the O2.
I know, "When seconds count your there in minutes"

Reply
Comment_arrow

Sally Citizen

8:25 am on Wednesday, November 24, 2010

James, what is a Srevent? Steve knows his job better than you do and verbally threatening people by denouncing their size is only admitting to your obesity. P.S. fires are attacked form all sides...and not just with H2O.

Thomas Tipton

11:37 am on Saturday, November 20, 2010

James, 'Steve' does not reflect the views of the majority of us on the Fire Department of Oak Lawn and surrounding cities.
There are times that we could have done more or done better. There are times that the whole story is not presented. In both cases it appears 'one-sided' in coverage and there is probably a little of both truths mixed in.
What makes ANYONE look bad, is when a MORON like 'Steve' shoots off his big fat mouth with insults in trying to make a point. Anyone reading the exchange will now see Firefighters and First Responders as a group of "Full of themselves, ' know-it-alls' who think they are tough and cool and more important to the earth than God and that their job is harder than anyone elses on earth!!! It really irks myself and fellow employees.
So, on behalf of the probably 90% of us, I apologize for 'Steve's' comments. They were rude and 8th grade-ish and a black mark against an honorable group of men and women.
Thomas

Reply
Comment_arrow

firefighter

3:30 pm on Sunday, November 21, 2010

Mr. Tipton, as a career firefighter for over 18 years, I believe I have a handle on the majority of the Oak Lawn Firefighters. You on the other hand are not an OLFD member, I've never heard your name around the area and think you’re probably just another alias of some politician looking to stir up more "hate". You don't like that I called someone a name but then go and do the same. You don't like that I speak for myself and my fellow firefighters defending against comments obviously meant to belittle the firefighters at the scene, but then you do the same. Do me one little favor, don't apologize for me, If I feel I have done something wrong, I'm man enough to apologize for myself. It wouldn't be the first time I've done either. But, as the character and professionalism of me and all the firefighters on the scene were insulted, I do not feel I owe anyone an apology. The initial tactics deployed were correct and modified as to the changing conditions of the fire. As firefighters I do not feel we are "full of ourselves" but I do believe we give 100% to safeguard the citizens and their property and are proud to serve. As for the story being one sided, here’s my side. I grew up in Oak Lawn, I have family and friends in Oak Lawn, and I’m telling you and the citizens of Oak Lawn, the members of the Oak Lawn Fire Department are proud to serve Oak Lawn and her neighbors.

The Apprentice

4:09 pm on Saturday, November 20, 2010

15 year veteran volunteer FO/PM (Ret) here, adding my two-cents:
Based on the scene photos (H/T to all contributors BTW), the IC made the right call to put "Big Water" on the fire from the downwind side (rule of thumb: Big Fire=Big Water), however, even a rookie knows water won't flow through a kink, no matter who's pumpin...jus sayin.
Look's to me like a defensive "attack" from the first in engine...and T.Tipton, true words bro. Keep your head down bud, I got your back (even though I was a volunteer).
10-8

Reply

Glen Kato

12:10 pm on Sunday, November 21, 2010

This is from the owners of Eva's Bridals. They are now working out of the old Men's Warehouse building at 6101 West 95th Street Oak Lawn. Customers can now stop there during normal business hours to have their questions/concerns answered by staff.

Reply

OLResident

6:28 pm on Sunday, November 21, 2010

Anyone who lives and/or works in Oak Lawn knows the Oak Lawn Fire Department are constantly running on calls. I live and work here and I can tell you first hand, that the fire and police department are at the scene of the emergency in a matter of minutes (usually 2-3). Clearing all traffic from 95th and Cicero around 3pm on any day is a huge task and they did this quickly. They also were vigorously working from the South side of the building where many onlookers videotaping/photographing could not see. Fire fighters need to remain calm and follow procedure which they did. I was there. I saw everything on the North side happen and I can say I am proud of our firefighters. They did a good job under the complex circumstances and most importantly no one got hurt.

Reply

Bill Andrews

11:05 am on Monday, November 22, 2010

anyone find out how the fire started? My guess was that some groom got cold feet and got a hot idea...LOL

Reply

Jim

7:55 pm on Monday, November 22, 2010

To john, Mr. Tipton, Mr. Laban and Mrs. Geertsema
Interesting comments you have made.
I am a member of the Oak Lawn Fire Dept and was at the fire. Have either of you contacted the fire chief for his side of the story?
In a matter of moments from our arrival, we had 3 hose lines flowing nearly 1000 gallons of water per minute on the fire. Extra alarm companies were responding but not yet on the scene when the fire displayed itself at the front of the store. Both Steves company and mine were forced to withdraw from the building due to the roof collapsing. We did not let the fire get past the Radio Shack. Had you been in the rear of the building as we were, you would have witnessed this. The building had a large fire load with over 1000 dresses reported to be in the store. (Sorry ladies but wedding gowns are flammable).
Fortunately nobody was injured. The business owner is doing her best to assist the customers
Both Steve and I are on duty tommorrow (Tuseday). Please feel free to stop by the firehouse so we may answer any of your concerns in regards to the fire.

Reply
Comment_arrow

joseph

10:43 am on Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Jim,We all know that fire fighters are highly trained, dedicated individuals.I can see why Steve could be upset when people question the way a fire is fought.Having said that, let me say a few words in defense of the folks that questioned the methods of the OLFD at the Eva fire.I saw the video that the Patch reporter took and had the same reaction.I then read the written report and it falsely confirmed what I witnessed in the video.Please read comments below taken directly from the Patch noting the word "before"."Patch editor Lorraine Swanson was on the scene and reported...Mannequins wearing wedding gowns could be seen going up in flames in the display windows at Eva's before firefighters started pouring water onto the building, Swanson reported."It seems to me that this whole"firestorm"of controversy may not have been ignited if the folks at the Patch would have taken time to either have taken video of the Oak Lawn Fire Department working at the parking lot side of the store or not written the story to sound like the fire fighters hadn't acted as promptly as they could have.In light of this maybe Steve was premature in calling James Laban "jerkwagon" I feel that he was misinformed by the Patch as we all were.As for visiting the fire station to talk with you and Steve it seems that Steve is a little hot-headed and I would fear for my safety in such a meeting.Maybe some one should pour a little water on Steve and cool him down.Great PR for O.L.F.D Steve!

Patch_comments_icon

Lorraine Swanson

3:20 pm on Tuesday, November 23, 2010

To James and the OLFD: I read James' last comment about my reporting of the Eva's fire, particularly the statement from the initial field report, "Mannequins wearing wedding gowns could be seen going up in flames in the display windows at Eva's before firefighters started pouring water onto the building ..." First, I in no way was criticizing the OLFD or their response to the fire. I think people are taking this sentence out of context. The OLFD performed with professionalism and valor. It was extremely windy last Wednesday afternoon, and you can hear it on the video. As one commenter, a retired volunteer firefighter, said, wind velocity was obviously taken into account when strategizing how to fight the fire. I rolled up literally with the OLFD around 3:54 p.m. last Wednesday on my way to an appointment at 95th and Cicero, which I did not make, btw. OLFD equipment was still arriving when I happened upon the fire. I briefly witnessed the activity in the parking lot behind Eva's and Radio Shack before I moved my car, parked a few doors down from Palermo's. I am also aware that there is video out there and have been contacted by a customer of Eva's who has video of the back end. I hope to post that soon. If anyone has video of the fire, send it to me and I will post it immediately. As far as I'm concerned, I thought the OLFD rocked and I apologize to the OLFD that my field report has been misconstrued as criticism.

Reply
Comment_arrow

joseph

7:34 pm on Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Wrong again Lorraine. Don't blame James for the comments about the comments about your reporting. Look again, it doesn't say James it says Joseph. Why do people even read this paper?

Thomas Tipton

8:11 am on Wednesday, November 24, 2010

Steve,
Yes, someone disagrees with you and immediately they are an alias of a politician and must be trying to stir up "hate". Ever wonder why you have the nickname you do at the Firehouse?? Think about it for a second and it will come to you.

There is a reason more people like Jim, than you. He can articulate a more logical arguement and make the department look better overall, than you calling someone a 'jerkwagon' or telling them to get back to solving puzzles on Wheel of Fortune.

I noticed that you didnt respond to James. Is it because when he told you he would kick your a** you shut up? Or did you just want to stay on the people who you think you can intimidate?

Finally, ever womder why 70+ of the members of the department didnt jump on this article and/or take a stand bedind you? Its because you cause more problems for us than help.

Do everyone a favor in the future and keep your mouth shut. Your skills as a career fireman are second to none, however, your skills as a public speaker and/or spokesman for the department are pathetic.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Linda

9:11 am on Wednesday, November 24, 2010

As someone who doesn't know anything about the politics within the Oak Lawn Fire Department and just saw the posts, I agree with TT. Steve, you did not represent yourself or the OLFD very well with your defensive and immature comments. As an adult, we all know that it is human nature for some people to criticize. As someone who is paid from the taxes of the community and a grown man you should rise above the criticism and know the comments of some do not necessarily represent all and therefore do not take them personally.

Sally Citizen

8:42 am on Wednesday, November 24, 2010

I thought you didn't know Steve? However, you know his nickname and cause more problems for "us"? That sounds a little odd from person who doesn't work for the OLFD or knows him.

How do you know "more people like Jim, than you"?

You outrightly admitted his firefighting skills are "second to none", so perhaps we should just listen to him.

Reply

Rebecca

12:30 am on Friday, November 26, 2010

I think the reporter Lorraine must be on Eva's payroll. Don't forget, these are the same owners who had another store downtown and closed their doors in the middle of the night...also the same owners who used to run Macy's bridal department until they got caught making fake Vera Wang dresses in their backroom. Save your sympathy for the brides, the owners are finally getting what they deserve.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Glen Kato

6:35 pm on Saturday, December 4, 2010

Eva's Bridals ( Oak Lawn ) is an independent store that has been in business for nearly 50 years. They have been in Oak Lawn since the early 1980's. They ARE NOT affiliated with any other bridal salon or store.

I am proud to be a friend of the owners and have also been paid to do some marketing for them over the past few years. Their integrity is rock solid.

Please see the following link for details.
http://www.evasbridalsofoaklawn.com/about-evas-bridals.html

Patch_comments_icon

Lorraine Swanson

1:26 am on Friday, November 26, 2010

Rebecca,
A well-documented smear campaign has been levied against Eva's Bridals of Oak Lawn as well as other prominent bridal salons in the Chicago area. Some of the points you bring up are from this anonymous letter that continues to be sent to customers of these salons like clockwork every two months. Eva's has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in court defending itself from these accusations. From this campaign, other rumors have evolved. A complaint has also been filed with U.S. Postal Inspector. I suggest that you read some of the other articles on this site regarding the fire. BTW, I am on no one's payroll except that of the news organization of which I am employed.

Reply

Mike lYNCH

1:22 pm on Saturday, December 4, 2010

They're breaking windows all over the place, allowing air in and causing the fire to spread even faster. The worse decuision made was to call the fire department

Reply
Comment_arrow

Glen Kato

6:14 pm on Saturday, December 4, 2010

Mike,

Try doing some reading and research before you make a comment.

When there is fire in a building, the heat, smoke and other products of combustion rise and become trapped in the upper most areas of the building, such as the attic. The temperatures in these areas can reach and exceed 1,000 degrees Fahrenheit.

This creates an extremely dangerous atmosphere inside the building for firefighters attempting to enter the building with hose-lines to extinguish the fire. The most efficient way to ventilate a building is to open it at the highest point to release the heat and trapped gases. Breaking the windows is the quickest way to release heat and trapped gases in the fire area and provide an opening through which the advancing fire hose can push the remaining heat, smoke and other gases out of the building.

Leave a comment