patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Jurcev Receives Probation for Election Fraud

Community activist accused of forging signatures on referendum petition is fined $610 and receives one year's probation in court on Wednesday.

 

Myrna Jurcev, the community activist indicted last fall on charges that she had forged signatures on election petitions, was given probation during a court hearing on Wednesday, Lauren Fitzpatrick of the Sun-Times reported on Wednesday.

Jurcev, 69, pleaded guilty to a single felony count of mutiliation of election materials, the Sun-Times reported. Cook County Judge Clayton Jay Crane also  also fined Jurcev $610.

Read the 'Oak Lawn Tax Watch Referendum Timeline.'

Jurcev served as chair of Oak Lawn Tax Watch, a watchdog group that tracked how Oak Lawn’s elected officials spent taxpayer dollars. The group gathered signatures for a referendum petition that was submitted for the April 2011 ballot to change the village’s form of government. Hundreds of residents signed affidavits stating that their signatures had been forged, including family members of Village Clerk Jane Quinlan.

According to the criminal complaint, when prosecutors first confronted Jurcev about the fraudulant signatures, she told them that her elderly mother circulated the petitions. Jurcev later changed her story, admitting that she forged voters' signatures as well as her mother's name on the petition.

The petition was eventually withdrawn after the allegations surfaced, and ultimately the referendum did not appear.

The tainted petitions touched off nearly a year of turmoil among the Oak Lawn Village Board, including allegations of violations of the Open Meetings Act after two “informational” meetings at Stony Creek Golf Course hosted by a quorum of village trustees.

Trustee Bob Streit (Dist. 3) termed the alleged conspiracy to commit petition fraud in an attempt to dump the managerial form of local government “serious hardball politics.”

Jurcev could not be reached for comment.

Related Topics: Oak Lawn Tax Watch, election fraud, myrna jurcev, and oak lawn politics

chull

7:28 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012

So basically one can mutilate & forge petitions with absolutely no consequences. What message does this slap on the wrist send? She shouldve been punished. This is a travesty.

Reply

Sandra Bury

8:17 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012

It comes to a buck or two fine per forgery. Seems reasonable, no? Outrageous, actually. For someone so concerned with taxpayer dollars, she should have offered to pay the court costs and fees involved to investigate and prosecute her. $610 won't come close to the thousands that had to be spent before she admitted to forgery. It looks like the taxpayers and public were the big losers with "Oak Lawn Tax Watch." No justice here.

Reply

OakLawnGuy

8:52 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012

This was obviously bargained. I guess Ms. Jurcev won't be too "activist" in the future.

Reply

nothanks

8:55 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012

This Judge must not realize all the lives that couldve been impacted by her forgeries. Myrna committed a felony. Forging names of so many people and lying about it shouldve landed her in jail. In Cook County where violent crimes happen it makes this type of felony pale in comparison but its no better.

Reply

OL Resident

9:48 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012

Restitution should have been made. If she could not pay it...jail time. That is not too stiff a penalty.

Reply

Judge Judy

11:40 am on Thursday, March 22, 2012

People People People. Calm down, the old lady just pleaded guilty to a FELONY! That is a harsh penalty. State's Attorney Alvarez, Clerk Quinlan, Trustee Streit and the other trustees deserve praise for bringing this felony to light and pursuing it in court. Justice has been served

Reply

andy skoundrianos

10:27 pm on Thursday, March 22, 2012

Sad Event. Myrna was never the real culprit in all of this anyways. Think to yourselves,
Who had the most to gain by getting rid of the Village manager?? Who openly supported the petition drive a " 1,000 " percent?? Who had his friends circulate and sign the petitions?? Myrna was just the " patsy " I really believe she was promised signatures by one or more "elected" people in the village that didn't come through for her and then she panicked and then the forgeries came. These people then threw her under the bus. I think I hear sighs of relief from a certain office holder in the village with a vendetta against the manager D.H. perhaps??

Reply
Comment_arrow

OakLawnGuy

7:37 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

I don't think Myrna was a patsy, and I don't think she was set up. I believe she realized at some time that she was not going to get the required number of signatures. Charitably, she was over-enthusiastic. Realistically, she tried to pull a fast one and took the stupidest route possible. Now, was she the drive behind the movement? I doubt it. Was she encouraged by certain elected officials? Probably. I have the feeling her mug shot is going to appear on some campaign literature early next year.

Comment_arrow

QC

10:59 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

Actually, think about it. Who would've lost the most had the referendum passed??
Streit, Ole, Duhig, Phelan, Janie Quinlan, and Larry the snake, oh yeah and probably li'l andy, who have a huge "vendetta against the" Mayor and Carol Quinlan.
Who knows, she could've been set up by those very same upstanding officials.
I think these board members think we, the taxpayers, are the "patsys"!
Get a grip.

OakLawnGuy

11:55 am on Friday, March 23, 2012

In the end, I think the parties you mention all gained politically. They - rightfully - smelled a rat and did something about it. I did not like the fashion in which they promoted their cause, door-to-door and a little too in-your-face in a handful of instances, but they weren't wrong. That they won a political battle was gravy to them. The petitions were bad, I doubt highly that Mr. Streit or anyone else who contested them had anything to do with the "badness", and they should have been questioned - and were.

Reply

Disgusted Voter

12:26 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

Well said Oak Lawn Guy. QC, like Andy needs to chill a little bit. Myrna is responsible not Heilmann or Streit or anyone else. First Andy, do you think Myrna would take the fall if she could get out of it by naming Dave as the leader? Please!
Now QC, your attempts to link the board members to the bad signatures defies logic and the facts. Myrna admitted she forged the signatures. She didn't say that anyone gave her bad signatrues. She forged them herself.
Now I suggest that Andy and QC get together and decide who really shot Kennedy!

Reply
Comment_arrow

andy skoundrianos

2:36 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

I think it was the butler in the library with a candle stick..

Fatsos is my fave 2

4:17 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

Lorraine, why was Fatsos is my fave's comment deleted. Andy is making libelous comments about DH, but that's ok? You're the definition of arbitrary and capricious.

Reply

Fatsos is my fave 2

4:18 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

Andy is an expert on cheeseburgers

Reply

Fatsos is my fave 2

4:21 pm on Friday, March 23, 2012

Andy got a Christmas card from bob

Reply

Dave W.

5:38 pm on Saturday, March 24, 2012

First, OLG, more excellent posts...DV, good supporting points...QC, Andy...they are right; if you could get out of felony by telling the prosecutor ANYBODY else's name, you would. Felony convictions don't just go away. She won't be voting, let alone organizing anything, anytime soon.
Was politcal hay made with this? Yes. Would some people have come out ahead if it had happened? Yes. Did she devise the plan to fake the paperwork herself? Most likely. Is Andy's comment libelous? Probably not...is it on the edge and can look over the fence at libelous? Maybe.
What I want to know is...What did Fimf2 say that got pulled?

Reply

Leave a comment