'No Evidence Suggesting Village Email System Was Breached To Distribute Political Literature'
Trustee Tom Phelan (Dist. 6) denies being behind recent anonymous email blasts circulating campaign mailer from mayoral challenger in upcoming April 2013 election.
Oak Lawn’s top cop said there is no evidence that the village email system has been corrupted or invaded to cull email addresses to distribute political literature critical of the mayor.
Sign up for the Oak Lawn Patch newsletter and breaking news alerts.
Mayor Dave Heilmann dropped the bombshell at the end of the Nov. 13 Oak Lawn Village Board meeting that village email systems might have been used to compile addresses for two anonymous email blasts circulating political literature by his opponent in the upcoming April 2013 election, Sandra Bury.
The attachment was similar to the 11-page political piece that Bury's campaign mailed to thousands of area residents over the summer, claiming the mayor had undermined a 3-year investigation into the village’s skyrocketing legal fees beginning in 2009, and that his ties to the former village attorneys may have cost Oak Lawn taxpayers $10 million.
The email blasts originated from gmail accounts registered to “P Franek” and “David Zabricki,” which were sent to residents' and village employees’ personal and workplace email accounts in October and November, the mayor said.
Both email blasts contained such subject lines as “did you see this stuff about dave Heilman????” and “Political Corruption in Oak Lawn."
The mayor said the village started receiving complaints from residents who had received the second emailing around Nov. 7. Many expressed concerns that personal identifying information they had disclosed to the village to pay bills and sign up for the emergency notification system may have been breached.
“Multiple people have contacted me regarding this email,” Heilmann said. “As the complaints started coming in they were reported to the Oak Lawn police chief. Most troubling was [the employees and residents] never gave out their email addresses to Oak Lawn government to then be taken and used for a political mailing.”
Follow Oak Lawn Patch on Facebook.
The mayor said that people tried to respond to the senders but did not get a response.
“It became clear these are phony email accounts. This a fraud, a deceptive act of whomever is doing this to protect their identity,” Heilmann continued. “The police chief has been told of this and is investigating.”
Heilmann proceeded to read excerpts from some of the complaints he had received:
“I’m a resident of Oak Lawn. I received this email today at my work place. This is not acceptable. I do follow the board meetings on TV and I know there are some tensions between board members …. Was this a security breach of my information registered with the emergency notification system? If so this should be reported. This is only place in the city of Oak Lawn that has my information.”
Another resident who had received the emails said that she had "reasonable concerns as to what other personal identifying information [the senders] were privy too.”
Heilmann said the attached political piece also had “identifying properties” indicating that the document wasn't scanned off of political materials that had been mailed this summer, because the original document was attached.
Document properties identify the creator of Bury’s political piece as “Tphelan,” presumably Dist. 6 Trustee Tom Phelan, one of the mayor's most vocal critics.
“The police are investigating this further,” the mayor said. “If you have received of these emails, I would imagine most people would delete these, if you have received them please forward them to the Oak Lawn Police Department. It’s going to be investigated by [the police chief] as well as other legal authorities.”
Asked if he was behind the anonymous emails and fake gmail accounts, Phelan said he had emailed Bury's campaign piece to various people who emailed it to other people.
The trustee's term is also up next spring, but Phelan hasn't announced whether he will seek reelection as the Dist. 6 trustee.
Bury said the writing of her campaign piece was a “group effort” and that neither she nor Phelan could take complete credit.
“A lot of it is from the Odelson Report,” Bury said, referring to the first of two legal audits conducted on the former Oak Lawn village attorneys. “I reach out to people who I think can help me with what’s important. You need someone there to give you insight.”
The mayor responded to some of the claims Bury raises with his own campaign piece, which he passed out to voters during the Nov. 3 presidential election.
Oak Lawn Police Chief Bill Villanova said in an email to Patch that his department could find no indication that the village email system had been breached.
“We have not found any evidence that any village email (Everbridge, water or village vehicle tag system, etc.) has been entered to obtain email addresses that were used in that political email,” the police chief wrote.
Villanova said he could not comment any further “as this is still an active investigation.”
Oak Lawn Village Board members are sceduled to meet for their regular monthly board meeting at 7:30 p.m. Tuesday (Nov. 27), and again for a special budget hearing on Wednesday (Nov. 28).
Read more GOVERNMENT NEWS:
SmallManBigWoman
7:27 am on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
I watched the video and Andy was right when he said the mayor was using public funds to blast a political opponent. A big no-no. I laughed when he said, "I hope you will delete them." I bet he'd like that!
Is anyone else sick of our Village Board meetings being used for personal attacks and accusations that don't have a shred of evidence? It's your record Mayor. It's facts, not "fraud."
Justhugeman
8:34 am on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
The big part of this story seems to be glossed over by the author. Tphelan is writing Sandra Bury's literature. That certainly explains the tone of the literature.
Also, while the author is quick to say no evidence has been found, she hides the fact that the investigation continues, placing those words as an after thought at the end of the article. The chief should haul Sandra Bury and Tom Phelan in and question them as to who they sent the e-mails to and where they got certain e-mail accounts.
anthony
1:37 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Somebody ask the police to look into the fake patch names .... all roads lead to 52nd ave...
anthony
1:41 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Oh and by the way Fat jokes are valid... Run with them
OakLawnGuy
9:23 am on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
They got the e mail address we originally used to sign up for online bill pay with the Village somehow, so while there might not have been a "breach" in the strictest sense of the word, something smelly happened.
andy skoundrianos
10:44 am on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
OLG, I never received an e-mail, I think someone who works at the village got the email and sent it to others, went viral, and that's why it happened My opinion only though. The Mayor should not direct public employees to do " work " on his behalf though
OakLawnGuy
12:01 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
So then how did it get to an e mail address we've never used in regards to the Village for anything but online bill pay? We've contacted the Mayor, many trustees and the manager via e mail but by using our primary e mail address. Not the one to which the Heilmann piece was sent. We get spam and junk there, of course, but receiving e mail regarding the election to this address which hasn't been our primary one in several years, well....more than coincidence. There's something behind it and it will take computer forensics to find out. The fact that an investigation may help Mr Heilmann's campaign is indeed a happy circumstance for him, but it does merit an investigation. These e mail addresses aren't part of a spam algorithm, nor were they picked out of thin air.
Dist2Curious
10:57 am on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Yeah, it went viral from the Village Hall send by the two famous people who work there: P Franek and David Zabricki. If you want to write and send nasty e-mails, then own up to it and send them out under your own name. Otherwise, shut the f*ck up.
Speaking of which, is there anything in Roberts Rules about people in the audience who just blurt out things and shout like they have Tourette Syndrome? Yes, the meetings are becoming a joke from the dais, but also from the floor. Just plain rude and ignorant.
andy skoundrianos
2:20 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
What's your name Curious?? Hypocrite sounds about right. The Mayor has never followed Roberts Rules of Order unless it benefits himself and his agenda. He even tried to limit more speech with his " fake " rules that was voted down. He has never ran a good meeting ever, either follow the rules or don't, because everyone plays to the cameras now and doesn't want any opponent on either side to get the last word, that is the problem.
anthony
1:29 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
The idea that someone "stole" an email address is so pathetically naive .... Such a mindless witch hunt that it bears no truth or consequence....
Tim
2:56 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Regardless of the content, I think the tactic of using anonymous/pseudonym e-mail addresses to send messages to people who did not request them is a shady tactic.
If you're resorting to using the same tactics used by "Deposed Nigerian princes" and "enhancement" salesmen you may want to question the direction of your campaign.
SmallManBigWoman
3:50 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
I got plenty of political emails this past election cycle. No biggie to me. I had them in my car, my home, robocalls, newspapers, emails. Whatever. I got far more from politicians in my inbox than from nigerian princes. It's the world we live in. The only reason Heilmann cares is because now he knows that his betrayal of the public trust went viral.
Tim
4:15 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
I also received many political calls and e-mails during the past election cycle, the key difference is that those other political messages came from sources who did not conceal their identity.
Dist2Curious
4:54 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Your rude and insulting response above and your misdirected anger issues only serve to reinforce the notion that you are badly in need of a filter.
All of which begs the question about being at the meetings and acting out. You're right - everybody plays for the TV, including you and that Debby Fagen chick. You don't speak for everybody, just yourselves. Ask yourself whether you would tolerate someone who acted like you at one of your Appeals meetings.
If someone can't at least try to act like an intelligent human being, then please shut the f*ck up.
Justhugeman
5:49 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
A filter or a muzzle? Why is the patch letting its star contributor attack people in the comment section but it won't let us analyze his writings when he "contributes" his off base opinions. I agree, Andy and that woman don't speak for anyone but themselves and sometimes probably not even for themselves
andy skoundrianos
7:03 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Use your real name Dave fan and post your own blog that's what I do.. Unless you don't want anyone knowing who you really are
Frank Abernathy
6:26 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Dave's rant on this was a waste of time. Unity Party got all our email addresses years ago. A certain trustee with renowned spreadsheet abilities has database with email addresses, home addresses, and what political signs you've had in front of your house for all elections since 2005. Just junk mail, delete it. End of story.
Frank Abernathy
6:27 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Andy didn't receive, yeah right? Go Vikings.
andy skoundrianos
7:02 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
No I honestly didn't, Mr. Unknown blogger.. I know all about our Mayor I don't need anyone to tell me about him believe me.. I am not a St. Lawrence man I like the Minnesota Vikings you should know that!!! Also the Cubs ,Bulls , Blackhawks, and Michigan State Spartans
randy manchild
11:25 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012
Andy didn't get the e-mail because he is a fifty year old kid. He doesn't own a house. He lives with daddy and sucks off the government with a monthly check. Yes, he admits that he is "disabled". OMG tell us the disability Andy.....
razorback
10:24 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
We have unsolved thefts and other crimes in this village and this is what our mayor directs of police chief to do? Really? Investigate emails from political rivals? He should be ashamed to ever even talk about crime
oaklawnconcerned
11:33 pm on Tuesday, November 27, 2012
Are you serious? He is the Mayor of Oak Lawn and has the legal right to do so. Have u no common sense?
andy skoundrianos
11:55 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012
Hey Dennis stop being the ghost writer and use your real name and picture refute my facts don't just throw bombs like you usually do. I do like the fake names they are pretty funny. How many lawsuits against you have there been now?? 3 or 4 I lost count
Oak Lawn Gal
10:24 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Election-related material was sent by 2 fake gmail account names to resident emails that were related to village services like online bill pay. There's every reason to investigate allegations like that because it's a misuse of data collected for village services. I'd expect further investigation. What the Chief is saying is the email system wasn't hacked. So someone on the inside shared the email addresses. The other thing is tactics like that tend to alienate people who receive the emails. So rather than helping Dr Bury it will most likely hurt her campaign. She really should get better advisors. It shows bad judgement to o.k. the misuse of village information resources just to win an election.
Jack Walker
2:18 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012
Me thinks this has Clerk Quinlans name all over it. Shes a party privy to this information, if I'm not mistaken.
JRV1813
10:34 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
School district 123 employees got the e-mail also. And those aren't shared on the bill pay. It's was internal.
Oak Lawn Gal
10:52 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Yes it was internal. Bill pay wasn't the only source of the email addresses.
SmallManBigWoman
10:59 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Hmm. Ten million dollar loss to taxpayers, sweet inside deals for friends covered up with confidentiality agreements, tampering with witnesses, attacking political opponents using public resources, clear corruption at the highest level of oak lawn government - and people are bent out of shape about an email? Reallly?
Where is the proof that the senders don't exist? Where is the proof that Bury's campaign had anything to do with it? It's not beyond the realm of possibility - and even far more likely - that people are so infuriated by what they see that they are moved to action.
Abe Froman
12:05 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Dr Bury. You're an idiot. If you can't figure out why this is a big deal, then you don't deserve to be mayor, which you won't be by the way. People could care less about your escalated attacks. What they do care about is there personal space, and accounts. Be that and e-mail, or personal information tied to that email address.
I would like to know where the 10 Million dollar comes from I doubt it is really that high. Think for yourself and make your own decisions, not Phelans.
Oak Lawn Gal
11:25 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
It's political email to email addresses collected as a part of village (and other) services. Why do you think village residents complained? The chief and others tried to contact the 2 bogus emails with no success. Gmail email addresses are easy to set up although I do think there are ways to track back to the source IP address. The material in the email was evidently all anti-mayor attack material (disclaimer I have not received the email.) Who does that "help"? Dr Bury of course. Let's face it she has no elected office experience and she has no way to reach the voters except to shout out at the board meetings. So someone (Phelan probably) is trying to help her get elected. Then he'd probably try to get elected for another term because he knows he can control Dr Bury. She has no strong political base so she had to align with someone to get elected imo.
SmallManBigWoman
12:07 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Oak Lawn Gal - that's the beauty of Bury. She's NOT a politician. She has enthusiastic support because she is a volunteer, a business owner and a person whose life has been devoted to serving her fellow man. It's no surprise that a grassroots movement of people is working to elect her. Including many who are former supporters of Heilmann who got burned, screwed, abused or just saw Heilmann as the toxic force he is. I'm one of them!
Barry O'Barry
7:22 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
smbw You and your "mini me" appear to be the Toxic Force behind this village. Why don't you and your Big Mouth take the Big Woman out of this town and into the sunset.. And don't let the door hit you, as they say!
Bury's judgement is reprehensible!!
Jack Walker
3:43 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012
Says Small/Big. Thats the beauty of Bury. She's NOT a politician.
Any beauty she MAY HAVE HAD sailed right out the window when she grabbed on to Phelans coat tails.
Abe Froman
1:34 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
STOP SAYING DR. BURY ISN'T A POLITICIAN.... SHES RUNNING FOR POLITICAL OFFICE... THAT WOULD MAKE HER?????/ A POLITICIAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Dist2Curious
11:47 am on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Before this thing dies, let's sum up. Sandra Bury, the candidate who is all about TRANSPARENCY, has Tphelan author and compile an e-mail for her and send it out. Whether it came from authentic or fake e-mail addresses is a red herring but for the fact that it's kind of a weasel thing to do. (And, by the way, just who do you THINK is running her campaign?) But, anyway, after the fact, she ducks, dodges and weaves her way around it and comes up with the lame comment that it "was a group effort and that neither she nor Phelan could take complete credit." How's that for transparency?
The problem with all politics, Oak Lawn's included, is this: When you tell a lie once, it's a lie. When you tell a lie a second time, it's a rumor. When you tell that lie a 3rd time, it becomes the truth for some people. Facts are what they are, but why let the facts get in the way of your opinion?
Campaigns around here are starting to be like people who watch FOX News and MSNBC. No matter what the facts are, people hear what they want to hear, they believe what they want to believe, and they would rather be told that they're right than actually be informed.
Oak Lawn Gal
12:39 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
I'm guessing the majority of the people who will vote in the village elections don't really pay attention to the board meetings. They may not even read Patch. I'm sure eventually the mayor will lay out the accomplishments of his term and he'll have responses to the criticisms. So we may see a status quo vote. That Phelan is running Bury's campaign is suggested by things like "Document properties identify the creator of Bury’s political piece as “Tphelan,” presumably Dist. 6 Trustee Tom Phelan, one of the mayor's most vocal critics." and "was a group effort and that neither she nor Phelan could take complete credit." If Bury wins then Phelan will pull the strings. Who wants a mayor who can't think for herself especially in matters of ethics?
Glen Kato
12:57 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Wow, I never through a case of spoofing would cause so much discussion. Imagine if we had these types of discussions about things like our 2009 building code required sprinklers for all businesses.
andy skoundrianos
3:01 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Ms. Gal Who is feeding you this misinformation?? Dave Heilmann?? Are you reading his talking points now. I am working for Sandra Bury I think she would do a good job. My biased opinion only Everyone on this site is partisan to one person or another for the most part. I do not hide my identity, I really can not seriously believe anyone who calls a mayoral candidate an idiot..... unless that candidate has been in office for 8 years.....
oaklawnconcerned
1:11 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012
Andy if you r working for Sandra Bury she will not succeed. U have a big mouth and have no respect for authority.
andy skoundrianos
2:51 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012
I worked for Dave last time and he won I don't have the biggest mouth, well not anymore at least..
Oak Lawn Gal
3:09 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Andy I respect your commitment to Oak Lawn. But you hate the mayor and support Phelan. So of course you support Dr Bury who seems to be joined at the hip with Phelan. I wish she had run as a true independent. I would have taken her more seriously.
oaklawnconcerned
11:03 am on Friday, November 30, 2012
Oak Lawn Gal... U r 100 percent correct. Dr Bury will not be taken seriously when she is dependent upon Phelan. Maybe a lesson learned for her! She can't be respected if she needs to lean on others for guidance. Dr Bury needs to lead on her own, before our village could take her serious as our Mayor! She has proven she has no true leadership qualities.
Bob
3:46 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Andy anything the mayor does you would blast. so what you say on the patch is taken for what it is.
andy skoundrianos
4:51 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Just as what you say sir
JRV1813
6:12 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
Doesn't matter. Bury isn't winning. Nobody likes her political attacks.
oaklawnconcerned
11:05 am on Friday, November 30, 2012
Agreed, Dr Bury your drama will cause your loss.
O.L. Taxpayer
11:17 pm on Wednesday, November 28, 2012
I wonder why the mayor had the police chief look into an office issue when he could have easily pulled his puppet to the side and had the distinguished representative of district 3 request an immediate forensic audit of the email system and for another $25,000 maybe we could find out that maybe the mayor sent out that e-mail. (but like all other audits, we'll never know what we paid for)
Homegrown in OL
9:05 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012
Excuse me, but this is a little more serious than everyone is thinking about. There is a huge potential that the Village of Oak Lawn’s data was compromised, which includes information that could lead to identity theft. In the State of Illinois, it is unlawful not to make a notification to everyone that their personal information may have been compromised even if there is only a possibility that it occurred. I would like to know what process was used to verify that the Village’s systems were not compromised. Did they hire an IT security specialist to investigate, or does the Chief know enough about IT to make such a comment?
Homegrown in OL
9:29 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012
Tom Phelan,
I’m curious on how it feels to be wrongly accused of breaching security for the Village of Oak Lawn? I imagine you feel like you have worked so hard and been loyal and dedicated only to be accused of something you didn’t do. Do you feel like people are trying to ruin your life after all you have done to try to help them? I certainly hope that you don’t suffer with depression for years because of this. I hope you don’t lose your faith in people and can’t trust anyone. Let me give you some advice Tom, be strong and never give up. Keep fighting for vindication, no matter if it takes years. On the other hand, maybe it has been you all along that breached security. If that is the case Tom, you should run over to St. Catherine’s and pray for forgiveness. Oh, that’s right; I do know the truth…better get the Men’s Club to start praying for you.
Homegrown in OL
9:51 am on Thursday, November 29, 2012
Mayor Heilmann,
Since you believe that the Village’s computer system has been breached, I certainly hope that you will do the right thing, follow Illinois State Law and make notification to every person contained within all of the Village’s databases that there is a potential that their identity has been compromised. Perhaps you should spend many tens of thousands of dollars performing a bogus IT audit, hold the accused against their will under false arrest, not allow them to defend themselves and try to ruin their lives. This is after all the process you utilize, is it not? Or, do you do that only for people who worked to support you, were loyal and dedicated and were being sexually harassed?
Jack Walker
3:34 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012
Isn't that the clerks job? She did it for the referendum petition. Although through all of the slander and salacious accusations she NEVER made a report or even notified the police. Isn't she overly concerned about OL residents this time around?
I wonder if shes come to realize what very bad choices shes made in recent years.
Unfortunately her BFF Bury is following her greasy trail.
James Manning
9:24 pm on Thursday, November 29, 2012
Hey I love your scotch Jack or is that your brother Johnnie?? I thought your buddy the Mayor ran everything in the village.. he sure acts like it
Jack Walker
2:08 pm on Saturday, December 1, 2012
What a zinger. Never heard that one before.
Hey I really respect your upstanding step brothers Peyton and Eli. Not surprising that they never mention you though.
Bob
1:41 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012
why does the patch still have this on the front page. Oh wait i forgot this is sandy burys campaingn paper.
James Manning
4:01 pm on Sunday, December 2, 2012
Here's a quarter Bob call someone who gives a S#*t
olanon60453
1:17 am on Monday, December 3, 2012
Where is Patch's coverage of this story? http://southtownstar.suntimes.com/neighborhoodstar/oaklawn/16707776-418/audit-oak-lawn-should-adopt-fest-policies.html
Lorraine Swanson
1:50 am on Monday, December 3, 2012
http://patch.com/A-zXrb
AlexOmustGO
6:29 am on Monday, December 3, 2012
Lorraine your allegiance is showing.
Abe Froman
1:36 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I agree. words like Minor, and angry photos of the Mayor. This is amateur political stuff..
Neighborhood Guy
6:30 pm on Tuesday, December 4, 2012
I agree. The way the audit story is written you would have thought that the audit exonerated Phelan. Then when you read the you realize he was wrong on every point raised. Nobody at Patch headquarters has the courage to stand up to the Bully and say "you lied to us". Instead, it's soft pedal everything so he doesn't turn into the incredible hulk and have a tantrum.
JustTheFacts
6:53 am on Saturday, December 8, 2012
Fact #1....Andy can do whatever he pleases on "The Patch". Fact #2.....Andy thinks his options are messages from above and he likes to think everyone should follow his word as gospel. He does not have the ability to have a discussion as he throws a hissyfit whenever anyone expresses a different point of view Fact #3: With that mentality and the vehicle of "The Patch" is an unchecked destructive force. Final Fact. Thus given this scenerio the best way to neutralize "Andy" is to ignore him. Yes this will make him stomp his feet harder and throw a tantrum...but eventually he will take his toys and leave and the adults can have a real discussion.
That's just the facts.....as I see them.
law abiding citize
2:25 pm on Sunday, April 7, 2013
When did oak lawn put a Greek Andy on the payroll? So your w bury I can see you met at the buffet. She is out of breath talking let alone being mayor. Think feds should look at bury and phelan breaking all kinds of laws. Andy too.