patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Preliminary Election Results Put Sodaro Five Votes Behind Streit

Trustee Bob Streit, Oak Lawn's longest-serving village board member, hangs on by a thread against write-in candidate Dan Sodaro.

 

Unofficial results from Tuesday’s consolidated election released by the Cook County Clerk’s office place write-in candidate Dan Sodaro fives votes, give or take a few, behind Bob Streit in the Oak Lawn Village Board Trustee race.

County election authorities still have not certified the vote in the 3rd District race that saw 730 write-in ballots cast to Streit’s 735 in the district’s eight precincts. Both preliminary counts released on Wednesday factor in early voting and absentee ballots.

Of the 6,687 voters registered in the 3rd District’s eight precincts — 3, 26, 27, 33, 35, 46, 85 and 112 — 1,735 ballots were cast in Tuesday’s election marked by a dismally low 16 percent voter turnout. Voters in the 3rd District also voted for library trustees and school and park board members.

Streit spent most of Tuesday sitting on a lawn chair outside the Johnson-Phelps VFW Post, greeting voters before they went inside the post to vote. Later that evening at De Ja Brew, where Streit had gathered with supporters to await the election returns, the senior trustee appeared stunned as Village Manager Larry Deetjen added up the precinct counts on a paper plate.

During the campaign, Streit associate Andy Skoundrianos chased Sodaro off the ballot after several politically volatile village electoral board hearings. Skoundrianos charged that Sodaro had committed “perjury and fraud” when circulating his nominating petitions—a mantra repeated by Streit throughout the heated campaign.

While Skoundrianos took the heat for filing the objection, Streit attended all of the hearings, sitting directly behind his friend and attorney Dennis Brennan, taking notes.

"The objection was legitimate," Streit said Tuesday night. "(Sodaro's) petitions essentially contained perjury by him and by one of his biggest supporters, Lynn Craig. Frankly, I don't think he should have run as a candidate in Oak Lawn. I don't think he should have been allowed to."

The Cook County Clerk has until April 26 to certify the votes in Tuesday’s suburban races. Sodaro ran as a certified write-in candidate. Only those votes for eligible write-in candidates are counted, as opposed to cartoon characters and celebrities.

Over the next two weeks, county election authorities will review all of the information provided by election judges from the 3rd District precincts. After the polls close, judges tally up the write-in votes and determine those that are valid.

According to the Cook County Clerk’s instructions to election judges, “Complete accuracy of a write-in candidate’s name is not necessary as long as the election judges can determine a voter’s intent to select a specific write-in candidate.”

“The name doesn’t have to be spelled correctly,” said Courtney Greve,  spokeswoman for the county clerk’s office. “We basically say there should be some relationship between the appearance and sound of the name on the ballot.”

If judges disagree about the validity of a write-in ballot, then a majority of judges will make the determination whether to count the vote. It is also likely that not all of the write-in ballots cast in the 3rd District will go to the certified write-in candidate, as some will go to cartoon characters or sports figures. Mickey Mouse, Homer Simpson and Michael Jordan are popular choices on write-in ballots, but are not counted.

By Wednesday, five absentee ballots requested in the 3rd District still had not been received by the county clerk’s office. As long as those ballots are postmarked by April 4, they can still be counted, Greve said.

While Sodaro’s chances of pulling off the seemingly impossible task of deposing the village board’s longest serving trustee had dimmed by Wednesday afternoon, Sodaro can still request a discovery recount.

Should a losing candidate capture 95 percent of the vote (in Sodaro’s case 36 votes within Streit’s 735), losing candidates can petition to have 25 percent of precincts re-tabulated. Such a recount could buy enough votes to put Sodaro ahead of Streit's 735.

“In this case of eight precincts, two precincts can be re-tabulated,” Greve said.

Related Topics: Bob Streit, Cook County Clerk, Dan Sodaro, Write In Candidate, oak lawn elections, and write-in votes
Do you think you'd be a good candidate for a local public office? Tell us in the comments.

Letthembeheard

7:21 am on Thursday, April 7, 2011

What about the voters disenfranchised by the clerk?

Reply

Letthembeheard

7:23 am on Thursday, April 7, 2011

Anybody read southtown where bob says dan ran a dirty campaign? How delusional is this guy?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Mary P. O'

8:21 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011

How about this one from the southwest news herald!
When asked if Sodaro’s first-time bid brought back any memories of his own experiences as a young, reform-minded candidate in the early 1990s, Streit replied that his was, and continues to be, a campaign based on honesty and integrity, not fraud. He fraudulently stated! hahahahaha!

Letthembeheard

7:41 am on Thursday, April 7, 2011

No doubt it was honest mistake, but you gotta admit with everything else that's happened it just fuels the fire.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Uh Oh

12:11 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011

There was Nothing Honest about Streit and Janes actions!

Coach Erik

10:36 am on Thursday, April 7, 2011

The only crook in that race was Streit. Dave has done a great job for the Oak Lawn community. Bob is totally clueless to the needs of his community. It is obvious when a write-in candidate can beat you. Bob just get off your high horse, and walk of into the sunset. Oak Lawn does not need your service any longer.

Reply

Tom Sodaro

10:48 am on Thursday, April 7, 2011

Wow, what a job by Dan. It is hard to have you and your family bad-mouthed by a person like Bob Streit. It is also hard to have people be afraid to support you in public because of the repercussions from Bob. It is hard to have people say perjury when they get Bob’s version of the fact. But it must be rewarding to do what few have done and that is to get over 49.5% of the vote as a write-in candidate. Maybe Bob will realize that he is doing a crappy job and he should look at what he calls “non-issues” and get off his butt and DO SOMETHING! Hell, maybe you would not have had to run if Bob would have done what he was elected to do in the first place.
Dan I’m proud of you and if this does not come out in your favor I am behind you in 4 years!
On a final note, this is the only comment I will make. All of the people that want to bad mount me-that’s fine. I have a real job and I am going to get back to work.
Tom Sodaro

Reply
Comment_arrow

Coach Erik

10:55 am on Thursday, April 7, 2011

Well put Tom! Many thanks to your family for enduring the trash that you have, hopefully we just get those 6 votes and don't have to wait 4 more long years.

J. J. Zurek

11:02 am on Thursday, April 7, 2011

Mr. Sodaro knew from the beginning, that the real people that circulated his petitions, where not the people who signed them as circulators'. However apparently the people that did circulate the petitions did not want to be identified for some reason or another, which shows a real lack of intestinal fortitude, on their behalf. If they felt that strongly for Mr. Sodaro or that strongly against Mr. Streit, they should stand up and be counted, instead of cowering like a bunch of cowards. That is why Politics and/or Politicians have been looked upon with disdain. It is really starting to look like no one is capable of winning any elected office without lying, cheating, stealing, whatever politicians get accused of, is because the climate of the electorate. I am willing to bet dollars to donut's if you ask a morority of the people who did in fact vote on Tuesday, why they voted for Mister or Ms. "X", they will not respond with
anything positive about Mister or Ms. "X", they will go into a bunch of negatives about the person that Mister or MS. "X" ran against. So it would appear that elections are no longer about voting for a candidate, it is more about voting against someone weather he or she is an office holder and/or a candidate to become an office holder. The reason I say all of this, is because those that feel that strongly against someone, or that strongly for someone at least that leaves some room for dialog. If nothing else to make certain is was for something truthful

Reply
Comment_arrow

Uh Oh

12:23 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011

Z
"Mr. Sodaro knew from the beginning, that the real people that circulated his petitions, where not the people who signed them as circulators'." How do you know this? Were you a circulator? Where is your proof of wrongdoing?

J. J. Zurek

11:48 am on Thursday, April 7, 2011

If my memory serves me correctly David Heilmann, Jane Quinlan, Alex Olejniczak, Thomas Duhig & Thomas Phelan know each other prior to being elected in Oak Lawn. Apparently they sat down and decided they would run as a team, they would raise money as a team, and they would campaign as a team, and apparently made something like a Blood brother/sister type pact with each other, and won the election as well. It also appears that after being elected someone failed to remember the "PACT", and as a result there is now some inner turmoil, because of the inner turmoil it appears new allegiances' are the results. I now believe that there are now some hard feelings among some of the original team, and now the individuals from the original team, are more interested in getting even, or payback or something with each other, instead of serving the people of Oak Lawn. If I am correct in my assumptions, the elected officials are guilty of MALFEASANCE or MISFEASANCE. If you start voting yea or nay because of who brought the issue to the Board, in lieu of the fact that the issue is good or bad for the residence of Oak Lawn, I believe that is what the Law says you are guilty of. Why not tell the voters what occurred to make the team dissolve it's blood brother "Pact", so the voters can decide who stays and who goes, instead of some or all of you secretly planning or plotting the others political demise. What would be wrong with putting Oak Lawn first, in lieu of your own political ambitions ?

Reply
Comment_arrow

Jim Hubert

11:55 am on Thursday, April 7, 2011

JJ
You mean be Honest about something? Ha!

Bulliesrus

11:50 am on Thursday, April 7, 2011

Bottom line is that Dan ran a straight (not streit) campaign. There was no "petition fraud"! If you don't believe it ask to see the election board final findings, Dan has a copy. I witnessed, no less than 3 times, Bob's thugs attempting to intimidate Dan while he was walking the nieghborhood. The only way to combat a "BULLY" is to stand up and not back down! That is exacly what Dan did! He faught the good fight. Even when he and his family were getting dragged through the mud, he continued to take the high road, unlike his opponent. As for "The Thugs"- "get a life"! You drive around following and "attempting" to intimidate a candidate, when there are better ways you could be spending your time. Why don't you go back to work, stand behind your cash register and give the correct amount of change. That's right, the machine gives it for you! Not much thinking to be done! Sounds right up your alley!

Reply

Uh Oh

12:08 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011

"Streit spent most of Tuesday sitting on a lawn chair outside the Johnson-Phelps VFW Post, greeting voters before they went inside the post to vote." Question. Was he chewing on toothpicks or his cigar at the time? He's such a classy guy.

Reply

QC

6:01 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011

llbean
The same can be said of Bob Streit and his supporters. He lost votes because of the vicious nature of his campaign, which was totally uncalled for.
I replied to your last post. Please give me the courtesy of answering my questions with answers not deflections. Thank you.

Reply

God bless you all

8:25 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011

God bless both candidates for giving time and energy. While I support Bob I very much respect Dans attempt which was helped by low voter turnout and most if not all of Bobs base thinking there was no need to vote. Good job both men and may God bless you and your families.

Reply
Comment_arrow

William J Murphy

8:46 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011

Well that's a left handed compliment if I ever heard one! Could it be that most if not all Bobs base aren't his base anymore and didn't vote for him on purpose? Sodaro ran an intelligent, high ground campaign. No doubt many, many, many residents were turned off by the viciousness of the Streit Campaign! Thank you Bob for being such a hoodlum. Thank you Dan for being such an upstanding gentleman!

Merrit

8:49 pm on Thursday, April 7, 2011

...reading the statements that some people have posted here sickens me, our town is in a sad and divided state and it shows in the attitudes and opinions of some of it's people. Dan Sodaro ran against a 20 year incumbent and did an awesome job. The fact the votes are so close, proves that Oak Lawn need a change, either in who represents us or in how they do their job after getting elected.
and a final thought....The big question on everyone's minds should be why/how the Village Clerk made errors in the district boundaries and how many votes were lost?

Reply

stop the nonsense

12:10 am on Friday, April 8, 2011

If Dan lost by 5 votes he lost don't start bringing in district boundaries 3 votes were lost maybe the county was a fault stop looking for excuses.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Danne

6:33 am on Friday, April 8, 2011

Stop the nonsense,

Would you feel that way if it was you that was not allowed to vote? The right to vote is a fundamental right, you must not be much of an AMERICAN if you feel that way. It is a very big deal!!! You should really use your real name so us AMERICANS know who you are. If the tables were turned and Mr. Streit lost by 5 votes, and the village clerk screwed up do you really think Mr. Streit (or Andy) wouldn't take that to court? Maybe not, after all Jane did support him!! Very questionable I'ld say.

I have a question if anyone could answer, When you vote early, who over sees the early voting? A judge or the village clerk?

Thank you, and GOOD LUCK to our village we surely need it!

J. J. Zurek

11:15 am on Friday, April 8, 2011

UH OH
When a person decides that they are going to be a candidate for elected office, there are forms that need to be completed by the candidate him or herself. Just to name a few "Statement of Candidacy" "Loyalty Oath" "Statement of Economical Interest". Plus get the correct petitions printed for the Exact Office they seek to be elected to, and the Term of the Office, etc. Plus depending on how many signatures they need to get on the Ballot they obviously get enough PETITIONS PRINTED. There is a specific amount of time designated for which the Candidate and the volunteers can circulate the petitions prior to filing them to be considered a candidate for office. The circulates of the Petitions are usually the Candidate him/herself or the friends and relatives (VOLUNTEERS). Every Candidate after retrieving the PETITIONS from the VOLUNTEERS goes over them and makes sure they are signed properly, Notarized Properly, Numbers each sheet in the correct numerical order, etc. . It is relatively Standard Stuff and the usual and customary nomenclature for any Candidate seeking elected office.
Most Candidates seek advice from election Lawyers, prior to running for Office, during the filing process to make sure everything is filed correctly, and to make sure if you have any opponents, that they did everything correctly also, if not you file a complaint and ask for a hearing to remove them if anything was done improperly. Which it appears is what happen to Dan Sodaro. To be continued

Reply

J. J. Zurek

11:36 am on Friday, April 8, 2011

Only one (1) of two (2) things could have occurred, either Dan Sodaro's volunteers did not want to be identified for some reason or another, or people who have an AXE to grind with Bob Streit, under the guise of helping Dan Sodaro, circulated Dan Sodaro petitions but did not want to be identified for various reasons had other people sign the petitions as if they circulated them, and as a result Dan Sodaro had to pay the price and get removed from the ballot. Politics in Cook County is definitely not a spectator sport.
It is rough and tough, sometimes even bloody. But that is because like I said earlier is people don't have any Intestinal Fortitude, I would say Cowards but that is too strong a word, but that goes to the simple fact of "People should say what they mean and mean what they say" There are numerous ways things like this happen. Someone on the Board don't like someone else on the Board, so they try to help someone else get elected, but they want to remain anonymous, because the incumbent might win. Or some outside source might want to get control of the Board, so they run people but don't want anyone to know what they are up to. It is something like these political people get married to each other for better or worse, just never forever. Someone wants more after they get there, then they did when they were plotting the original invasion, and one or more of the others decide to put that person in her or his place. The fight starts and then you pick a side. The end

Reply
Comment_arrow

oaklawnmom

9:06 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011

Or option 3 - the petitions were valid. Or option 4 - none of the above. I don't think that those are the only options available Mr. Zurek. I really believe you need to rethink your options on what actually occurred.

Uh Oh

11:53 am on Friday, April 8, 2011

Z
Thanks for the info and possibilities.

Reply

tech 5

1:27 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011

OK HERE WE GO- PLEASE SCROLL TO TOP OF PAGE AND CARFULLY READ BOB'S MAILER. SOUNDS HONEST, BUT THE TRUTH IS SINCE MY RESISDENCE IN HIS DISTRICT SINCE 96 ,THE MAN HAS NEVER SHOWED HIS FACE AT MY DOOR. UNTIL RECENTLY DURING THIS CAMPAIGN WHEN HE FAILED TO RECOGNIZE THE THAT THE SQUARE SHAPE AT FRONT OF HOUSE IS CALLED THE FRONT DOOR. WELL AS IT TURNS OUT, THIS GUY FINALLY SHOWS UP- BUT AROUND THE HOUSE UP ON TO THE REAR DECK TO MAKE HIS PITCH,OR SO WE THOUGHT. HIS FISHING EXPEDITION OF TRICKS WAS NOT ABOUT THE COMMUNITY OR CONCERNS OF US AS RESIDENCE,BUT OF SOMTHING ELSE. WELL NOW THE IMPORTANT ISSUES THAT WE AS A COMMUNITY SEE EVERY DAY ARE IGNORED AND HAVE BEEN FOR MANY YEARS. I INVITE ALL OAK LAWN RESIDENCE TO LOAD UP THE FAMILY AND DRIVE TO 99&MELVINA,MAYBE A PICNIC PERHAPS AND ENJOY WHAT BOB SAYS MATTERS TO HIM BUT DONT LET THE KIDS GET TO CLOSE!!. JUST REMEMBER YOUR NOT ON SHORE DRIVE!! CANT WAIT FOR SUMMER!!!!

Reply
Comment_arrow

QC

1:41 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011

Adam
Was his expedition regarding your deck? Was it sort of a threat? I wouldn't doubt anything this guy and his Bullies do.

tech 5

4:29 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011

NO , NEWER DECK, THIS WAS A PANIC VISIT, ABOUT THE PETITION, BUT NEVER ONCE ASKED ABOUT CONCERNS OR ISSUES WE MAY HAVE. TIME FRAME PUTS THIS ABOUT THE SAME PERIOD WHEN HIS CAREER DISSIPATION LIGHT STARTED FLASHING. THIS DISTRIC NEEDS CHANGE ,THATS ALL IM SAY'N .

Reply

sad but true

4:47 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011

Quit whining if your guy lost so be it come back in 4 years and do it again. Don't blame anyone else when you have a 16% percent turnout I don't think voters really cared about either candidate. They could care less about neighborhood meetings,email messages,how long you've lived in Oak Lawn, Who went where and who got this for the village, They are worried about keeping their houses and jobs Sad but true

Reply
Comment_arrow

QC

10:04 am on Saturday, April 9, 2011

They do care if they're NOT ALLOWED TO VOTE FOR THE CANDIDATE OF THEIR CHOICE!
They care if they took the time to excersise their RIGHT TO VOTE AND WERE REFUSED their choice!
They care if they're sent on a WILD GOOSE CHASE BY THE VILLAGE CLERK (WHO'S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE WHOLE MESS) who's BACKING A PARTICULAR CANDIDATE!
They do care if the VILLAGE CLERK WATCHES OVER THEM AS THEY VOTE IN THE EARLY VOTING!
They do care if THE VILLAGE CLERK ENGAGES IN UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR!
RESIDENTS DO CARE!!!!!!!

tech 5

6:53 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011

TRUE THE ECONOMY IS IN POOR STATE, BUT DANGEROUS PROPERTIES ARE JUST THAT!! PERIOD!! YOU CANT CANDY-COAT SUCH MATTERS. THIS JUST DID NOT HAPPEN OVER-NGHT, WERE TALKING YEARS!!
ANY VACANT BUILDING WHICH, BY REASON OF LACK OF MAINTENANCE,ORTHE BOARDING UP OF ITS DOORS AND WINDOWS,OR OTHER REASONS,THAT HAVE A SUBSTANTIAL ADVERSE EFFECT ON THE VALUE OF THE PROPERTY IN THE IMMEDIATE NEIBORHOOD. THIS ISN'T WHINING,THIS IS FACT AND THE FACT IS THE PRINCIPLE USE OF THES BUILDINGS HAS BEEN ABANDONED, AND HAS NO FUNCTION OR USE. SO WHAT YOUR SAYING IS TO RE-WRITE THIS AGAIN IN 4 YEARS IF MY GUY LOST, BECAUSE YOUR GUY CANT DOESN'T CARE??? THESE ARE BUILDINGS THAT ARE DANGEROUS, AND HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH EMAIL, JOBS,OR MEETINGS, BUT ARE IN DANGER OF COLLAPSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART AND JUST PLAIN UNFIT FOR HABITATION. STREIT HAS HIS OFFICE LESS THAN A BLOCK AWAY, AND FOR 2 YRS THE "SAFTY" BARRIERS HAVE BEEN LAYING ON THE GROUND. THATS BECAUSE THE WALL COLLAPSED ON TO THE SIDEWALK WHICH STILL IS THERE AS YOU READ THIS.. I'M NOT MAKING THIS STUFF UP ,BUT DO HAVE TO DRIVE BY THIS EVERY DAY -SAD BUT TRUE.

Reply

John Zazula

11:05 pm on Friday, April 8, 2011

Oak Lawn Mom when are you going to stop drinking the kool-aid?? The petitions were tossed out because of perjury and a pattern of fraud.. not my words the words of the electoral board which by the way contained The mayor and Jerry Hurckes who ended up supporting the candidate they themselves removed from the ballot?? It didn't even matter because the write in candidate almost won anyway Which shows the voters don't care if a candidate does his petitions right or wrong. That is a bad statement concerning the politics of the present in Oak Lawn

Reply
Comment_arrow

QC

9:45 am on Saturday, April 9, 2011

That's right Tommy Bob blame the Residents for Streit's BAD SHOWING, not the fact that He's inefficient, lazy, arrogant and only in the race for political gain. Not because he ran a despicable campaign. Not because of his downstate "Boss". Keep finger poining and deflecting.
The residents are seeing through all the BS.

J. J. Zurek

5:37 pm on Saturday, April 9, 2011

Why can't we all just get along. The election is over. Everyone should stand around the camp fire, hold each others hand and sing Kum Bah Yah. Life is too short. If everyone used all of this pent up animosity toward a common goal for the betterment of Oak Lawn, it would have been achieved already. It is quite obvious that someone had an ulterior motive, and it is now resulted into some very hard feelings #1 and created a bigger divide #2. Which is only going to hurt the people and the Village of Oak Lawn, more then any one or two individuals in the long run. Put those petty little differences aside, roll up your sleeves and work toward the betterment of Oak Lawn, and leave those fragile humongous ego's at the front door on your way into the Village Hall. Stop the bickering and let the betterment begin.

Reply

QC

8:21 pm on Saturday, April 9, 2011

Anyone know if Pete ever called Carol to concede?

Reply

Gman1

11:51 pm on Saturday, April 9, 2011

Did Sodaro call Streit ??

Reply

QC

6:55 am on Sunday, April 10, 2011

That race isn't over yet but when it is, one way or the other, I'll expect li'l andy to be on an extension.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tim Moran

10:06 pm on Tuesday, April 12, 2011

When is the next election, I can't wait!

Merrit

1:10 pm on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

curious if anyone knows if Streit paid Andy's attorney fees yet?

Reply
Comment_arrow

William J Murphy

8:06 pm on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

On the video in the Election Rewind column dated 4/10 Bob says that he hasn't discussed it with Andy yet.

Isabel P

2:11 pm on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Merrit, aren't you concerned about how Dan Sodaro can now afford an atty like Richard Means when he was billed 20,000 for Ancil Glink services that he never paid? Him Dawn and Lynn Craig then lied to the entire community about it claiming they coudlnt afford the legal bills when in reality they were given free legal representation. Total lies to gain pity and sympathy from the voters. Looks like it workd. How they can look in the mirror as perjurers and liars is beyond me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

politicsiscrazy

5:22 pm on Wednesday, April 13, 2011

Isabel P. Your post sounds like a bunch of others posting under a different name. As stated in another post under another article.........I think you are completely wrong under many of your assumptions.................
Has anyone ever confirmed what Sodaro's legal bill actually was from the electoral board hearings? I seem to recall reading that if Sodaro continued his fight the legal bill would be in excess of $20,000, not the final bill. And I don't believe anyone is snubbing their noses at any charges but even Bob Streit says he wishes the objection was never filed. Is it possible the accusations were false considering he said hindsight is 20/20? That was the impression I received. Plus I've read about the bullying tactics at the petition signers doors. Were these affidavits signed under duress? Lots of questions and not many answers.

dickmeansdick

2:30 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Who is paying Richard Means for Dan Sodaro? Either Heilmann or Hurckes or both.

Reply
Comment_arrow

shameonoltrustees

2:59 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

What business is it of your's?? Who's going to pay Jane's Attorney Fees? NOT THE VILLAGE, that's for damm sure! Hey, maybe Brennan can give Her "a Discount", for being "a Team Player", just like Andy!
tommeansprk.

POS TP

6:40 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

we'll have fundraisers for sodaro, scumbag.

Reply

Concerned Son

6:41 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

I grew up in Oak Lawn and I have no stake in Oak Lawn politics as I moved to a place where people actually turn out to vote and, should it be warranted, changes are made. However, if any politician ever attempts to intimidate my elderly parents for not signing a petition again by confronting them on their front porch (you know who they are, now you know who I am), I can promise you that I will get involved and use every available legal means (and I have many) to ensure that his conduct is punished, publicized and ANY candidate running against him will receive more support than the politician can hope to drum up. Guaranteed. Be very careful who you attempt to intimidate, be very careful; this is about a trustee, nothing more. Too bad I found out about this yesterday, but I can assure you it won't happen again. For anyone else out there, feel free to contact the Attorney General's Office, they'd be interested. Better yet, go Federal. There'll be more on this issue. It's obvious by this blog that there are intimidation concerns. Why? It's village trustee, nothing more.

Reply
Comment_arrow

QC

9:44 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

Concerned Son
GET INVOLVED.

takes 1 2 know 1

9:04 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

CS the perjurers who falsely signed are to blame. They fraudulantly circulated and fraudulantly signed and its unfortunate that those liars are so desparate they'd lie cheat steal and take advantage of people like your parents. Son you are blaming the wrong bunch. You yourself seem like a bully making all kinds of meaningless threats online. If you really had means you wouldn't be bragging online under a false name.

Reply
Comment_arrow

QC

9:37 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

takes aka Tommy bob
You don't even make sense. concerned son never named a group, although everyone KNOWS which Group he's refering to. " those liars are so desparate they'd lie cheat steal and take advantage of people like your parents" (Seniors). Hmm. Nowwho's MO is that? I've got it! Tommy bob,Their Village Thugs and their Thugette Jane, (who specializes in Secretly contacting seniors about their Identities being Stolen and fraud and perjury.)
If you were so Right and not a cowardly Bully threatening and lying online Tom, you would be using your real name.

oaklawnmom

9:26 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

mr. takes 1 2 know 1.........if you actually read concerned son's post..........it said about NOT signing a petition.........not because they signed a petition. concerned son, can you please clarify? thanks!

Reply

andy skoundrianos

10:39 pm on Thursday, April 14, 2011

How bout you QC I use my name what's yours??

Reply

Leave a comment