What Should Go Here? Does the Village Green Need Fixing?
A long-stalled plan to move the Oak Lawn Masonic Hall and possibly expand the village green by 40,000 square feet has seemed to gain some momentum.
A long-stalled plan from 2009 to move the Oak Lawn Masonic Temple seemed to gain some movement this week when village elected officials put the proposal before the community on Monday.
See the pdf of the 2009 Masonic Program Analysis.
Should Oak Lawn Village Board members approve the plan, the existing Masonic Temple will be demolished. The Masons will move into a brand new building on 53rd Court to be paid for by the sale of village-owned properties as part of a land-swap deal.
Mayor Dave Heilmann put the motion on the village board's consent agenda in February, but Trustee Alex Olejniczak (Dist. 2) asked that it be tabled until a community meeting could be held.
The village has made an offer to the Masons based on a 2009 appraisal capped at $875,000.
According to what the mayor told residents on Monday, the village has received an offer in excess of $1.75 million from a “substantial interested party” for village-owned properties on 95th Street—including the Oak Lawn Senior Center.
The sale would allow village-owned properties to be put back on the public tax rolls, Heilmann said.
Conceptual drawings of a “multi-seasonal park” possibly including a fountain pool, ice skating rink, enhanced concert stage and temporary buildings for Farmers Market vendors, coffee stands, and the like.
Renovations of the village green—should the plan ever go before the village board for a vote—could cost $2 million to $3 million.
Olejniczak questioned whether such an expenditure of tax dollars was a wise investment at this point in time with all that the village has going on, including labor contract negotiations and the 111th Street development.
The trustee also wondered if some of the proposed enhancements could be made without knocking down a building and putting up a new one paid for by public monies.
Mayor Dave Heilmann said that we should never shy away from what is possible.
So we put the question to our readers: Does the Oak Lawn village green need fixing? Whether or not the village board approves plans to move the Masons—what, if anything, should go here?
OakLawnGuy
6:21 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
This may not be a bad investment, but it's not the right one right now. We could all come up with about 300 other projects and investments that would be more timely. Consumer confidence is higher people are not going to start tossing whatever disposable dollars they have around town. The Village should follow in a similar vein.
andy skoundrianos
12:30 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
Wow Something me an OLG agree on!!!! Call Ripley's
OakLawnGuy
12:57 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
Eh, it happens more often than you would think. You like your guys, I like mine, and sometimes the twain meets!
n/a
8:19 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
My taxes were raised $2500 this year. I would rather have that money back!
Oak Lawn Gal
8:23 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
I don't see the need to improve the Village Green at this time. If the village is going to get some money for the sale of property on 95th st. why not bank it instead of turning around and spending it.right away? As an example would an ice skating rink be nice? Sure. Do we need one? No.
Dan
8:36 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
We can be against this spending of our taxes all day long but the village is going to spend our hard earned money any way they want to.So lady's and gents be ready for our taxes to go up again because we need to fix something that is not broke.The money is burning a hole in there pockets and it must go.So bend over my friends and take it.
Dan
9:34 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
2 to 3 million to fix it up.Are they out of there minds?
2nd
9:36 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
I don't know what meeting Lorraine was at, but I certainly did not see this proposal 'gain' any momentum. I saw a majority of the people at the meeting that were NOT in favor of any part of the plan. The Masons would make out like bandits in this deal, getting a brand new, modern building with handicapped accessible entrances and an elevator, all paid for by the Village.They clearly stated they're not putting a dime into it. Besides the cost to build them a new building (and how many of those projects come in on or under budget), there's the cost to completely redo the Green. Trustee Olejniczak estimated that would run 2 to 3 million dollars. But that was just his estimate. I do not believe the Village really knows the cost, or if they do, they are not saying at this point. That fact that this is being discussed mostly behind doors and with 'confidential' investors (for the senior center property) smacks of backroom deals and slimy politics. I want TOTAL TRANSPARENCY and I want ALL the people of Oak Lawn to have a say in this. Its time for the mayor and the Trustees to stop riding roughshod over the Village Green neighbors, drop this nonsense and focus on the problems they already have - the vacant businesses and the 111th street debacle.
raineday
10:01 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
I am for this upgrade to the village green. The only way to make Oak Lawn a viable inner ring suburb is to make it attractive to young people who wish to raise their families in our community. Oak Lawn needs attractive amenities which will help it to remain a community people choose to live in not just get stuck living in. Our community needs to look to the future. Or,the very best days will be only memories.
Grunty
10:02 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
Oak Lawn has pretty low residential property taxes. The property tax increases you are seeing are from the state, not Oak Lawn. Oak Lawn gets the majority of its revenue from commercial property taxes and sales tax. At least that's how I understand it, someone can come and correct me if I'm wrong (but please provide a source).
I was talking about this with my father who lives just a block over from the Village Green. He's pretty much against it for the same reason's everyone else is, our taxes going up. That's really probably not going to be the case, as a residential property tax increase (again as I understand it) has to be voted on by the public.
My confusion on this project is that I'm not sure what we are trying to do in Oak Lawn or what Oak Lawn is trying to be. Or for that matter, what the residents want oak lawn to be.
I've seen people come on here and complain about section 8 housing and the like, and like in this article, I've seen people complain about spending money to improve Oak Lawn. In the discussion about what to do at 95th street and Cicero, numerous people have advocated for a Trader Joes.
Does anyone honestly think that the people using section 8 vouchers are shopping at Trader Joes? In order to get stores like that in here, you are going to have to make OL more desirable to the sorts of sophisticated people that would shop there.
This includes improvements LIKE, buy maybe not necessarily, the improvements to the green.
Grunty
10:05 am on Thursday, April 5, 2012
If its not clear, I'm for moving the mason's building. Not only for the improvements and things, but the mason's have let us use that lot for numerous things for decades If they get a slight benefit from the whole thing, good for them.
Also, I'd love an ice skating rink :D.
OL Resident
12:34 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
I agree with OLG and ANDY. This could be the start of a revolution
andy skoundrianos
12:38 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
Can you tell The only one for this is The Mayor?? By the way we already have an Ice rink that is losing money every year for the Park District
Pat F
12:44 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
The small piece of land will not make enough difference to warrant anywhere near 2-3 million investment to redo the village green. Some of the things you mentioned could be put on land already owned by the village. In this economy I don't see spending a lot of tax dollars that aren't absolutely necessary. Bringing people into Oak Lawn would be helped by enforcing some of the villages' laws and codes. Abandoned vehicles, lawns a foot tall at houses and empty lots, cars parked on lawns,blocking sidewalks, by intersections near schools, and loud partys at houses(usually rented) that go on every weekend, Gang meetings in our parks, grafitti removal, etc..etc. These should all be given immediate action. I see code enforcement cars drive by these problems all the time, seldom stopping. Why do we have to call constantly to have these problems corrected?? Can't the village correct these simple problems? These are issues keeping people from swarming to Oak Lawn! Gangs mainly flock to places they don't get bothered. Bother them and just maybe they will move on.
This whole deal with this building shouldn't be a concern. Worry about it when the economy recovers. The village currently has more than enough projects and problems to work on.. Let's fix what's wrong here Now before you take on anymore projects..Please try to turn this around so Oak Lawn can return to being a safe, family friendly community.
Dan
1:29 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
Pat you must live near me,We have the same problem/
OakLawnGuy
1:03 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
Speaking of the Park District....someone correct me if I'm wrong, but do they not have jurisdiction over this property? If so, why are they not at the forefront with ideas to raise the cash, and plans? And Andy, I believe the Village Manager is a proponent of this project as well as the Mayor. I haven't been in the Ice Arena in years, but if it's in the same shape as the pools and Pavilion, then there's no wonder it loses money.
2nd
2:19 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
The comment was made by, I believe, the mayor at the Monday meeting that the Park District does not have the money to pull off this plan. All the more reason, in my opinion, not to go forward with it. I understand the Masons have let the library and village use the parking lot over the years, but there are other neighbors who do also and the Village is not offering them a new building at the cost of $875,000.
Pat F
3:35 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
OLG..you forgot the seldom used golf course and the racquetball courts...These are all Park District properties that certainly have big budgets but seldom get updated?? Where are they using this money??
2nd
6:05 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
Isn't it interesting too, that during the meeting on Monday evening, in trying to 'sell' this idea to residents, the mayor stated that there has been an uptick in the economy in the Chicagoland area. Yet in the article under the fold on the front page of today's Reporter newspaper regarding the OL Trustees discussing the hiring of an assistant Village Mgr to help the eternally unreachable Mgr. Deetjen, the mayor is quoted as saying "We are having a more difficult time in terms of the economy. I don't know if the timing is the best." Wow. A classic case of talking out of both sides of your mouth, Dave. So which is it, Dave - is the economy in an uptick or are we having a more difficult time with it? Seems to me, If its Dave's idea, we're in an uptick. If its someone else's idea, its a difficult time in terms of the economy.
Dave W.
6:09 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
I also wondered why we need an OUTDOOR ice rink, when we can't 'fill' the indoor one at anytime of the year.
I also wonder where the senior center and the family services building will be transferred...no mention in the article or on this board. Maybe I missed it, if so, can somebody enlighten me?
Pat. F., you are right on so many points...I'm not quite sure how you know all the problems in the town are rentals, but otherwise, you seem on target.
Sure the Masons have 'been nice' but I will be nice too if they give me a brand new building AND tear down the place I gave them. That amount of space just doesn't warrant SO much money for a larger band shell (which will be THAT much more noise right next to the residents) and an ice rink with concession stands. Is somebody on the board a Mason? (Not to start any conspiracy theories, especially with the Masons, who have enough.)
Until there are no gangs and drugs are a negligible concern, why are we cutting social services? Do we have a new high school with modern amenities? Fixed streets? Finished alleys?
HAVING SAID THAT...we DO need to balance keeping the town updated and appealing to a younger generation of home buyers. Good schools, low crime, and nice parks are all part of the mix, along with our great library, location and shopping, restaurants, etc. Affordable homes with reasonable taxes will keep us vital.
I just don't see THIS project being the answer, especially with so many questions in the rest of town.
2nd
6:25 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
OL Family Services in now in the 5210 building, Dave W.
2nd
6:33 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
And, if I remember hearing correctly during the verbosity at the Monday meeting, I believe it is the mayor's plan that the Village would lease the building the 'interested' buyer would build on the site of the current Senior Center and Chamber of Commerce building for the Senior Center. You know - where the net increase of parking spaces is going to be created (uh huh, right). I could be wrong though since it was difficult to pick out what mattered in the overflow of double speak that was going on.
Dave W.
6:34 pm on Thursday, April 5, 2012
Thanks! I stand informed on that. Now if only we could get an answer to the rest as easily, right?
andy skoundrianos
12:27 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
I must be in a dream... Other bloggers think the Mayor is wrong??? Next thing you will tell me is my Cubs are going to win the World Series this season....
Bob
11:09 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
I wouldn't under estimate Theo, this year he seems to always have something up his
sleeve. This is coming from Oak Lawn's Mr. Cub!
Rich Pankowski
9:37 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
It appears that one of the biggest problems with the article is that people now believe it will take 2 to 3 million to renovate the village green. The problem is that those numbers came out of the mouth of Alex Olejniczak, who as usual has no facts to back up the statement.
Sell the village owned building and use that money (i think an article said $1.5 million) for this project.
Grunty
9:53 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
I see that people are complaining about gangs and graffiti and how that should be addressed and money used to stop those things. Well, look at how well that works for chicago? Its all about the people that live in the neighborhood.
What Oak Lawn needs to ask itself is does it want to be an extension of the south side of chicago, or does it want to be an extension of the southwest suburbs like palos and orland?
Don't get me wrong, I don't think Oak Lawn is a bad town, I mean, I bought a house here just ten years ago after growing up here. I'd just like to see it improve enough so my wife stops pestering me about moving out of cook county entirely....
Like I said, I don't know that this project is the right one, but it is (for right now at least) the only thing thats been brought to the table. If for nothing else, I kind of hope this starts a discussion of some other sort of improvement that maybe everyone can get behind.
I'd love an outdoor ice skating rink. An outdoor rink is totally a different atmosphere then an indoor one (just look at how popular the NHL winter classic is), and might just get more people interested in ice skating and using the indoor facility more. If the people of Oak Lawn really don't want one though, I doubt it would see a lot of use.
Dan
10:17 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
Please stop with the dam ice rink.You are the only one here that wants a 500 thousand dollar ice rink for what a couple of people to skate on it in the winter.Then what do you do with it in the summer turn it into a basketball court? Ya that brings in good people and how much can you make on that? If people bitch about the hours on Halloween and what kind of people come to oak lawn to trick or treat what will you bring with an ice rink and a basketball court.Fie the dam streets and lets keep the street cleaner working all year not just once a year.
Grunty
10:48 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
U mad bro?
Grunty
10:02 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
Since this would take a long time to get going, what if we rented one of the portable ice skating rinks and set that up in the parking lot to see how much use it got before investing all that money. At least investigate the cost associated with doing so before going all out?
Dan
10:19 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
Dude what is with you and ice skating? there are other thing that oaklawn needs.
Dan
12:05 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
No i ant made bro but an ice rink over other things.Just dont sound like a good idea.
Dave W.
11:58 am on Friday, April 6, 2012
Grunty, unless you have the contract to BUILD that rink, I think it needs to be on the backburner until LOTS of other things get fixed or solved. It isn't that it is the worst idea ever, or that the park in general should not be improved, just that if times are tough, you prioritize. Most of our tax reveniue comes from business, yet we are closing down one with no specific plan for replacement (NO, building a shell they HOPE to fill is NOT a plan), just as they did before (on 95th), and all of THOSE STILL haven't been filled. 95th and Cicero is a revolving door despite being the highest profile spot in town.
The deal for the property on 95th Street to the 'undiscloseds' should happen regardless of the Mason building, if it is such a good deal. However, when it IS done, we better get to see EVERY piece of paper related to the deal. Citizens should know where (and WHO) every cent went. If they dont 'want to agree tot that, it says a lot about what kind of deal this is...the old-school, shady, backroom kind.
Grunty
12:53 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
As I said, it doesn't necessarily need to be THIS plan. Ice rink is just what this story is about and the plan. I'm happy for any kind of improvements to the town. A couple of these commentors think that I'm "pro-ice rink" when I'm simply pro-improvement. An ice rink would make us stand out, and I'm not totally against the idea (if the people that live over there supported it). I know I'd use it, that's all. I definitly don't advocate putting in an ice rink that only I'd use.
Would I be as fond as say a plan to turn it into a community garden or a local art museum, no but I wouldn't be entirely against the ideas either. I'd want to have them fleshed out and give the ideas a chance. I'm just pro-improvements, and if someone has a good idea on some improvements lets hear them. I do think the mason's building can be moved and that lot used for something else. Does it need to be tommorrow, absolutely not.
Street repairs are going to happen regardless. Its a seperate funded project already past the planning stages. Sewers need to still be upgraded as well (i believe) but I only seem to hear about them when we are flooding.
Lifelong Oak Lawn Resident
12:10 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
does anyone else realize that our mayor is OBSESSED with parks? oak lawn has all these expensive parks that i always see EMPTY; no one uses them! also parks are some of the dumbest things you can build for a village, because they are relatively expensive, and they create few jobs. How about saving the firefighters!?!?
Dan
12:19 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
Yes look at all those statues in the parks and no offense to anybody but a child in a wheel chair statue.when i drive by there it looks sad.
Grunty
12:36 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
We go to a park at least once a week weather permitting. When it is really nice, we go much more often and we rarely go to the same park. We were just at that park on 90th and mayfield (not exactly sure if that is the intersection) on wednesday.
Bob
11:20 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
How long hqve you been here?
I am the 5th generation of my family to live here.
I agree with you the firefighters should come first!
We do NOT need to renovate a park we need to pay our employees back which was part of a concessions deal that this administration made! I was always taught that people come first!!!!
Dan
12:50 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
That is great that you go to parks but how many do we really need if you swung on 1 swing you swung on them all. a slide is a slide the kids don't know the difference.I live by a park and all it brings in are young kids making trouble..Il bet it cost more to maintain the parks then it does to pay our firemen.Il bet we have more parks then firemen.
Dave W.
3:13 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
Dan, while NOT expanding the Village Green is probably the way to go, acting like we essentially need only one park in the whole village, because "if you swung on 1 swing you swung on them all. a slide is a slide the kids don't know the difference" is just silly. People don't want to travel all over to get to one park, or even a couple.
I don't know which park you are near, but the ones I take my son to are never deserted, even the smaller ones. (The one by the old OLCM where the 'sad' statue of a wheelchair bound child sits ALWAYS has kids coming and going.) Have I been to EVERY park in town? No. Many, yes. Also, I drive through town a lot because of being in real estate, and I notice things like that. Why? Because they DO reflect on a town. People some even without kids, ask about a park being nearby, or at the very least are happy to hear that there IS one.
Parks are also greenery, which helps to keep our air cleaner, allow a spot of nature from the rows of homes, and often can fill an otherwise useless space. Once installed, most modern park equipment is pretty maintenance free.
Does this mean the firefighters are undeserving? It is a different department, with a different budget.
None of that means you are wrong to question a village expansion of 'The Green', though...we need more details and, as usual, more transparency from the elected officials, along with some actual facts.
Dan
3:26 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
Grunty just said if you read it is that they do travel from park to park.
otni3
1:08 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
Why does Alex Oleniciak throw his cigarette buts into the grass at the Village Green? Head of the green committee -- -- -- -- hypocrite.
Lorraine Swanson
1:19 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
Trustee Olejniczak quit smoking in the fall. I stopped nine months ago (my third attempt). Kudos to Alex. It's a tough habit to break.
Dave W.
2:59 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
So, otni3, FORMER hypocrite...
Bob
11:22 pm on Friday, April 6, 2012
Keep up the good job Lorraine!
Grunty
11:00 am on Saturday, April 7, 2012
Dave W.
I'm just curious, and I'm not really sure how to ask the question without being to open ended, but when you are showing homes and talking to potential buyers (I assume you are an agent from an earlier post, sorry if I'm wrong) what are people asking other then proximity to parks (and of course the location of a school)? Are there things they are looking for that Oak Lawn doesn't have? Are the streets somethign they are saying is preventing them from making a purchase?
(Please don't take anything above as a demand or an attack, I am genuinely curious and text can't always portray emotion properly)
Dave W.
2:58 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012
No offense taken, Grunty...HONESTLY...while it depends, of course, some questions are more repeated than others...Income levels, how close are schools, how good are the schools, how is crime, is house X a good value, how long will I have to live in it to make my money back...is this (location X) the 'good' side of town...some are less frequent; parks the library, shopping, restaurants. Some will, sadly ask, about the ethnic make-up (and not always the ones you think!), but some things, race, familial status, etc, are off limits. My quote on those things, in fact, is "Even if I could legally tell you, I wouldn't, and even if I wanted to, I couldn't legally do so." I then refer them to the census bureau or zipskinny.com for whatever THEY think is important, so long as they don't tell ME what they use in regard to our search.
I work a bit more with buyers and renters, so I come across these types of questions from people who are typically looking to move INTO Oak Lawn, versus maybe move out if they are selling. They are concerned with finding out what kind of town Oak Lawn is, for them, their families, kids, pets, everything.
Dave W.
3:04 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012
We (Oak Lawn) are competing with every surrounding collar town, as well as some further in, due to Metra access. Our taxes are low to comparable with many neighboring areas (like Evergreen Park, for example, but not only them). Our library is second to none, really. The parks DO say to young couples or families that there is a place for them to raise their children. We have senior services, we have family services, charities, churches of nearly every stripe...We have carnivals and the Fall on the Green. People either know and are attracted by those things, or find out and are pleasantly surprised by them.
Every so often, though, I do get asked why we have so many vacant businesses in prime spots, to which I often don't have a great answer. Oddly, empty homes don't bother people as much, probably because they figure it is helping them move here. empty retail is noticeable, though, it seems. Which is why I harp on it. I want those palces filled, but while I don't want another gold exchange, or another currency exchange, and please, NO MORE BANKS...yeesh...I don't know why people have such over the top expectations for chains that barely survive in WIllowbrook (WholeFoods) to move in here with a lower median income. Not that we can never upscale, but those things don't happen in a month or even a year just by adding a store that nobody in the town can afford. It takes gradual steps, attractive infrastructure (good schools, low crime) and time for those results.
Grunty
8:56 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012
Thanks for taking the time to reply Dave, that was very insightful. I'm also not a fan of the empty storefronts, but am/was of the mind that it would fix itself should we get people to want to move here. Your statements that it is sort of the opposite is making me reconsider my position.
Dave W.
9:12 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012
Grunty, it is sort of hand-in-hand thing, I suppose. Neither one is going to get too far ahead without the other. Without industrial, which Oak Lawn has very little, we are mostly bound to the balance of commercial and residential. Ultimately, it comes down to we just went through the Great Recession and it still doesn't feel like we in Oak Lawn are really out of it. Both will come back, in time. Whatever the demand is for it, THAT is what will fill those spots. People complain on every board that we 'need' this upscale store, or that one...if people move in that can afford Saks, that is what will build. If it is K-mart (which, somehow, apparently, still made money there). THAT will be there (111th). Should the town be controlling so much 'real estate'? I don't think so. Having said that, if they do something good, really inspired, anywhere, and do it legally, transparently, and sooner than later, I will be the first to praise them.
Also, real estate, residential, won't come back until there are real jobs. I mean better paying jobs, not glorified part-time jobs, with no benefits. The retail jobs that are created by most of these places are of course beneficial to the area, but they don't support households alone, or even in tandem, for a house costing $200,000. Until all the foreclosures are bought up and the jobs come back to the area, housing will lag. It is a weird dance that people want the stores, and the stores want the people, and who goes first?
CJM
9:28 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012
The fact that OL is competing with every other town around is exactly why they should be looking to differentiate themselves and take advantage of their "footprint". The foundation is already there, and this is yet another opportunity for OL to make a statement about what kind of place it'll be in the future.
However, with the tone of many of the comments on this story and others about development, one would think that OL should open a soup kitchen, homeless shelter, and second-hand store because Oak Lawners are just a bunch of po' folks who can't possibly support anything even remotely upscale. If this type of thinking prevails, it will become a self-fulfilling prophecy.
I'll continue to watch these developments closely. Within 2 years we'll be looking for a place to be "reverse snowbirds". Oak Lawn is the only suburban and South Side location we're considering. C'mon Oak Lawn...give me some reasons to choose you!
Dave W.
9:48 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012
CJM, first of all, when you come, please remember me. I live in Oak Lawn, work in Oak Lawn, and love buyers.
Okay, pitch out of the way...my remarks are now manyu and scattered, but suffice it say it isn't that I WANT nothing upscale. I've only said it will happen gradually, and there is no 'magic beans' that will transform our town overnight, or even in a year. As people age out, the new families coming in need to be of higher income than what we have now. If the numbers were there now, we wouldn't be having this discussion at all. I never advocated for low income places, just said that Oak Lawn seesm very erager to chase out existing businesses (which are paying taxes) to MAYBE get in something 'nicer' that always seems to be in a TIF (no taxes). I don't want the gold place, the title loan place, I do business in other towns, and all there are are those places, liquor stores, gun shops...I don't want to live there. Oak Lawn isn't "po'" it just isn't 'rich' either. We are so comsumed with being Orland, or La Grange, we don't have an identity. Unless you count empty store fronts. I would rather they be filled with Sav-A-Lot than empty three time in two years (95th And Cicero). NOTHING is left, almost, at 103rd and Central...95th and Cook is STILL unfilled, and has had turnover constantly, as has 95th and 52nd Ave. Nothing moved into Topnotch Burger...sorry, a little bit more...
Dave W.
9:55 pm on Saturday, April 7, 2012
Chicago Ridge Mall is across the street, AND right off the expressway, and they are always in a turnover condition, yet we are going to build a NEW mall at a MORE remote location, by a CEMETARY? In front of a WILDLIFE PRESERVE? Do people even listen to themselves as they say these things? They have wishlists, because as Sheldom satirically meant but ironically gave us is that, it IS all about him. He didn't REALLY mean it, but, everybody thinks that because the same ten or twenty people write on these boards a major corporation is going to go against all logic and MARKET RESEARCH to build a multimillion dollar facility that will be underused and close in two years. We couldn't even keep Wendy's or Delfreakin'Taco open! Andy's is a niche so they will be okay. I've seen people ask for Nordstom Rack, WholeFoods, Hollywood Theaters...
You want better incomes to live here? BUILD A NEW HIGH SCHOOL. State of the art. THAT will have the best impact of putting us on par with Orland or Palos or LaGrange. It is what built Oak Lawn in the first place; Cook School, right next to the tracks, so everybody could see a huge BRICK school. Look it up. Good schools, low crime, works everytime.
Oak Lawn Gal
12:18 pm on Thursday, April 19, 2012
Dave W your insights are great. Since you are in real estate I wanted to ask you a question. Often when there's a story about crime in OL or improving OL someone throws in the Section 8 comment. In your opinion what percentage of housing in OL is section 8? I just don't see it but I'm not a realtor. Thanks.
Dave W.
1:48 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
OLGal,
It is MINIMAL, at best. We get calls non-stop at our office, which is one of the bigger ones in town, from people seeking section 8. It is virtually non-existent in town though. I can't say 100%, but I look for rentals EVERYDAY, and they aren't. I think we would all fall over at this point. Again, I can't say 100%, but since 2005-6, I don't recall seeing any. Does it mean there are none? No, because unlike home sales, we can't track the numerous rentals that are off the MLS. Still, we have a large enough sample size that I can't believe there are NONE in the MLS but tons rented through yard signs
Dave W.
2:06 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
I would add that that conversation is really a red herring disguising some ugly euphemisms and prejudices. I remember this going back to the 95th and Cook debacle...code words like 'low-income' and 'section 8' were bandied about to drum up fear of the incoming condos that were going to be built, because it was in the 'charter' that they were allowed. Now, I HATE those condos, but the notion that politicians were, or now ARE suddenly or EVER going to risk not getting re-elected by somehow INSISTING that such tenants be foisted upon the area is ludicrous on the face of it.
That is separate from the notion that all section 8 or lower income people are inherently dirty, crime-ridden gutter-folk.
Section 8 is VOLUNTARY, people! NOBOODY can FORCE any landlord to accept section 8, and not everyone, either landlord or tenant is automatically accepted into the program. Oak Lawn has a very healthy rental market, with above average pricing. All types of people want to live in town, because it is a vibrant, safe, easy town to live in. While I'm not always the biggest espouser of the free market, it is doing the job here...supply and demand for rentals keeps the prices more than healthy. Many people who would like to rent here end up settling for the surrounding neighborhoods/towns, solely because the price is too much. As I've said, section 8 in town is beyond a scarcity. I have no personal knowledge of any section 8 in town, and I just checked for giggles sake a minute ago.
Oak Lawn Gal
9:13 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
Thanks for putting this to rest Dave. Of course it's a euphemism or code-word. I also think (in other topics) people raised it as some sort of scare tactic. But as a realtor you would actually know the facts. Thanks for sharing! Where I live all of the neighbors know each other and we are quite a rainbow group :)
Dave W.
10:01 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
OLGal,
You are totally right that it is a scare tactic. The funny, though not funny ha-ha thing is that people often have no problem saying racist things in front of me, to me...since I'm a lifelong white guy, they presume I'm 'in the club' or something. I have no idea what makes people so comfortable with such terrible thoughts, but I shudder to live in such a world, and it is frankly quite depressing sometimes. People like that can't go away fast enough in my mind.
OakLawnGuy
11:48 am on Friday, April 20, 2012
When the original proposal for a 7 (possibly 8) story edifice at 95th and 52nd was put forth, Mr. Streit distributed literature highlighting the fact that a certain percentage of the units would be Section 8 as mandated by the government. It's a scare tactic that was certainly used with some success in Oak Lawn; as everyone can see, there is no residential structure there now.
Dave W.
12:06 pm on Friday, April 20, 2012
OLG, it has been used repeatedly by many, but you are right about Mr. Streit. I have spoken to him, face to face and called him out about it, and he doesn't really deny it or defend it with much vigor. He knows it is an old school fear tactic. There is NO such mandate from the government. It is listed as a POSSIBILTY, as it is (I think it HAS to be) with govenrment funds even possible. (If they try to file for grants or whatnot, they can't have language that specifically bans things like that, or any other fair housing practices.) Again, it is racist on the face, or AT LEAST prejudiced, because it supposes that section 8 is inherently evil, criminal and dangerous. There are numerous reasons other than scaring people with race/crime to oppose such developments if one wants to use crazy things like FACTS. It is disappointing that we are represented by somebody that doesn't value them.
Marilyn Bly
11:56 am on Wednesday, June 20, 2012
We need side streets paved ,curbs redone lets start with those projects.