Trautsch: 'We Don't Need Any More Rules'

Oak Lawn Trustee Cindy Trautsch explains why she voted no on the mayor's ordinance to add additional "Robert's Rules" to the village code.

In a turn of events that surprised some regulars in the board chamber last Tuesday, Oak Lawn Trustee Cindy Trautsch (Dist. 1) voted no to an ordinance that would have amended the how village board meetings are conducted.

Subscribe to the Oak Lawn Patch newsletter and breaking news alerts.

The measure was introduced by Mayor Dave Heilmann over the summer to cut down on the “unnecessary fighting” during village board meetings.

Last month, the village board voted 4-3—the mayor flexing his newfound board majority—to approve the "language" in the proposed revisions to Title I, Section 6-5, Rules and Order of the village code.

The Oak Lawn Village Board's rules of decorum are based on Robert’s Rules of Order, long considered the gold standard for running meetings effectively and fairly.

Trustees Alex Olejniczak (Dist. 2), Tom Duhig (Dist. 4) and Tom Phelan (Dist. 6) were the loud dissenters.

Among the changes the mayor wanted to introduce was a rule that gave the village board president sole authority to remove an item from the agenda deemed “obstructionist,” or a perceived attempt by other board members to use parliamentary procedure to push a political agenda.

Tell your peeps to like Oak Lawn Patch on Facebook.

Trautsch, who went along with the board majority at the August 16 village board meeting, astonished many by voting no on the ordinance. It was defeated 4-2.

“We don’t need any more rules,” she said. “We’ve got ‘Roberts Rules of Order’ already. We should work with what we got. If we can’t behave ourselves we shouldn’t be in office.”

Trautsch said the mayor “has all the Robert’s Rules he needs to gavel in and out whoever he wants.”

Appointed to fill former Trustee Jerry Hurckes’ seat last year when he resigned to go back to his old job as Congressman Dan Lipinski’s chief of staff, Trautsch has maintained a mostly quiet demeanor on the Tuesday night dais.

Asked why she changed her mind, she said: “I thought about the last meeting, going back and forth with [Tom Phelan] on the length of three minutes and five minutes comments. I thought we were all in agreement about the length of time to comment. We weren’t.”

Mentioning that she was putting pajamas on a young grandchild when contacted by phone Sunday night, Trautsch said that nobody called or conferred with her to change her vote prior to last week’s village board meeting.”

“I don’t talk [to the other village board members] ahead of meetings,” she said. “I have too many other things to do.”

Trautsch neither confirmed nor denied that the mayor was upset with her after the meeting.

“Things happen,” she said. “I vote the way I think. You can’t make everybody happy all of the time. You got to do what you think is right.”

Like many in the board chamber last week who were wondering, “What the hell just happened here,” Heilmann said he wasn’t sure either. He thought village board approved the amendment when they voted on its language last month.

“Even though it wasn’t approved as an ordinance, the prior vote (August 16) on the language puts it into effect,” Heilmann said. “The lawyers are figuring out what it means. I’m not going to weigh in a legal opinion.”

The mayor said he hadn’t had a chance to talk to Trautsch since last week’s meeting.

“I didn’t know if she had a change of heart or if there was something she wanted to change,” he said. “I’m sure we’ll talk about it.”

Asked if he was mad at Trautsch after the board adjourned its executive session last week, Heilmann said: “I wasn’t mad. Not about Robert’s Rules.’”


State Senate Candidate Barbara Bellar's YouTube Video Tops 1 Million Views

Kmart Property Takes Giant Step Toward Redevelopment

Trustees Vote 6-0 to Release Confidential Legal Report

andy skoundrianos September 19, 2012 at 07:23 PM
The board was professional and all on the same team until 2009. What happened there?? The board began asking questions about the Mayor's handpicked law firm and the skyrocketing legal bills. The Mayor took offense and said if you not with me you are against me and went on the attack against his former party mates and the manager. It is all in the report read the e-mails,that's when all the fighting really started..
OakLawnGuy September 19, 2012 at 08:54 PM
Petulance is not exclusive to one "side" or the other. That's what bugs me the most, and it's at the root of a lot of the actions taken by those within and without the old Unity Party from day 1. Whether it was Mr Hurckes grinding away at political wheels to undermine the UP, or individual party members going against him or Mr Deetjen or each other, I'm not so sure that professionalism had been in the forefront. And that's too bad, because these folks did some good things. Their motives are being questioned now, so......we'll see what shakes out in April I guess. I will say that I echo those who wonder when Dr Bury is going to address other Village issues, and I will reiterate that as long as some of these officials, elected and otherwise, remain in office, there will not be a good level of transparency.
SmallManBigWoman September 19, 2012 at 09:13 PM
Hey Melissa? Are you our new candidate for clerk against Jane? We haven't heard a peep out of Heilmann - rumor has it that he's frantic behind the scenes to figure out a way to make this report which quacks like a duck sing like a canary? If you are Ms. Moran, what is your motivation to run against such a steady and dedicated and ETHICAL - and BELOVED clerk like Jane Quinlan?
Melissa September 20, 2012 at 12:57 AM
Wrong again...I am not a candidate however I am a concerned taxpayer in the Village. Jane may be all those great things you state however that does not mean that she doesn't need to campaign and have the taxpayers re-elect her. There should be no hard feelings if she has an opponent after all this is how our great country works...democracy. Hopefully she will continue to rise above and remain independent so she doesn't get dirty in the muddy water. I totally agree with Oak Lawn Guy!
andy skoundrianos September 20, 2012 at 02:31 AM
Then I guess Dave isn't mad that someone is running against him??


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »