Trustee Wants To Know Who’s in Bed with Who in Village Government — Literally

An Oak Lawn trustee says term "domestic partner" is too vague in revamped ethics ordinance; he also suggests providing a form requiring village officials to list their sexual relationships.

Oak Lawn Tr. Bob Streit during his remarks on the conflict-on-interest amendment to the village's existing ethics ordinances during Tuesday's village board meeting.
Oak Lawn Tr. Bob Streit during his remarks on the conflict-on-interest amendment to the village's existing ethics ordinances during Tuesday's village board meeting.

An Oak Lawn trustee wants elected and appointed village officials to disclose their sexual relationships as part of a revamped ethics code.

Trustee Bob Streit’s request came before a vote to add a section prohibiting village officials and employees from using their positions to influence government decisions in which they have a distinguishable financial interest.

The measure also bars elected officials from participating in discussions or voting on matters during village board meetings in which they, their spouses or “domestic partners” have derived or expect to derive income or compensation for a period of one year.

Prior to being elected last April, Mayor Sandra Bury ran on a platform of ethics reform in the Village of Oak Lawn. Streit, in suggesting the sexual relationship disclosure, said the term “domestic partner” is too vague.

“I don’t think we can seriously think that this is a finished product,” Streit said during Tuesday’s village board meeting. “I have several suggestions to tighten up the ethical issues and the loopholes that don’t go far enough to protect the taxpayer.”

Streit said the ordinance exempted Bury’s relationships “because she’s not married.” He recommended eliminating the loopholes affecting the mayor and trustees by further clarifying the definition of “domestic partner” in the ordinance.

“I know that everyone here is married except for the mayor, but I would think the term [domestic partner] should be defined to include anyone who has a sexual or cohabitation relationship with any official,” Streit said. “We live in a new world and ‘domestic partner’ may not describe all of the relationships that all officials have today.”

The trustee opined that he didn’t think the ordinance went far enough if it didn't include those sexual relationships that “any party may have with another person.”

“Perhaps we can include a form that requires all of of us to list such relationships,” he said. “I can’t believe that any elected or appointed official could argue that such disclosures are necessary unless that person has something to hide.”

He added that the ordinance was a good start but it should apply to everyone, “including attorneys, advisors, handlers, drivers and even the mayor.”

“In any case,” Streit said, “these are just suggestions that we should discuss if you are truly interested in providing transparency and good government during your tenure. I would offer the above suggestions as amendments to the ordinance.”

In addition to strengthening the definition of domestic partner, Streit said the ordinance created other potential problems and conflicts, mentioning the mayor’s optometry practice.

Streit said that under the amended ethics ordinance, that the mayor would be required to disclose relationships with her patients wishing to do business with the village.

Adding that other than an exam fee, federal privacy laws prevented her from revealing patients’ identities, a trust she held sacred.

“That would be for the [village] attorney to decide,” Bury said. “When you start talking about personal relationships and why you’re targeting me with this type of language, I would really like an explanation.”

The mayor countered with a suggestion to include language for extra-marital affairs.

“Why you’re not including language with respect to other potential relationships people may have, I think it’s vulgar what you’re implying and not saying. I would want an apology.”

“Why, what was I saying?” Streit asked. “Your relationships are ruled by the ordinance. I think they should be included.”

Oak Lawn trustees, one who was seen rolling his eyes during Streit's speech, voted 6-0 to amend the ethics code.

Streit voted yes as a start “but I want to see these amendments.”

Oak Lawn Gal October 13, 2013 at 09:29 AM
I think anyone who can effect business & financial decisions for the Village should reveal relationships that could pose a conflict of interest. It should apply to the mayor as well as trustees, the village manager etc. It's a case of undue influence. I'm not sure why people oppose this or are getting so exercised. Didn't the mayor run on a promise of "transparency"?
Luther October 13, 2013 at 11:00 AM
john, I believe there is a pot and a kettle waiting for you.
RightSaidFred October 14, 2013 at 11:16 PM
Please, can we just get back to business? This entire conversation is a conflict of intelligence.
Pepper Potts October 15, 2013 at 11:27 AM
Bob Streit is an idoit. Please ignore him and focus on what is more important; such as our local businesses and community.
anthony November 02, 2013 at 10:08 PM
So question who has the same sex partner living with her and collecting the benefits they want to now eliminate Just asking ?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »